Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives

Message board

* FAQ    * Register   * Login 



Reply to topic
Author Message Previous topic | Next topic
Morrigan
Crone of War

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2002 7:27 am
Posts: 10528
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:45 pm 
 

Lord_Of_Diamonds wrote:
There's a world of difference between malicious objectification and purposeful imagery changes that everyone in the band (especially the one who's going to be the "sexy" member, if any) agrees upon. Again, refer to what I said about issues arising if the imagery is creepy or rapey. The simple existence of sex appeal in music isn't a problem and it always rubs me the wrong way when I see people talking shit about groups like Arch Enemy, seemingly just because of the existence of an attractive female member among them who (I assume by her own choice) plays up her attractiveness.

...WTF does Arch Enemy having an attractive person as a band member have to do with what the OP is talking about

You're conflating topics, but again, I suppose I should not be surprised. You're out of your element, as always
_________________
Von Cichlid wrote:
I work with plenty of Oriental and Indian persons and we get along pretty good, and some females as well.

Markeri, in 2013 wrote:
a fairly agreed upon date [of the beginning of metal] is 1969. Metal is almost 25 years old

Top
 Profile  
Defenestrated
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2022 1:50 pm
Posts: 300
Location: United States
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 7:54 pm 
 

No comments on the thread, except to say I found it weirdly funny that gabber’s signature appeared right above this sentence from the post immediately below:

Quote:
I think there's a lot of attempts at sex appeal that don't particularly respect my intelligence.


What are those lyrics from, BTW?

Top
 Profile  
Lord_Of_Diamonds
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:23 pm
Posts: 1618
Location: United States
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 8:18 pm 
 

Morrigan wrote:
...WTF does Arch Enemy having an attractive person as a band member have to do with what the OP is talking about

You're conflating topics, but again, I suppose I should not be surprised. You're out of your element, as always

The original poster was talking about sex appeal "ruining" an album if the band didn't really do that kind of image before, or just if sex appeal in general makes people think of an album as "juvenile". I went on to state how I thought that bands choosing to incorporate sexy imagery is not a problem unless it's creepy and how when I see people complain about sex in music they're usually prudes. When someone told me this was a "brain dead take" I rationalized myself and listed Arch Enemy as an easy example, because they have an attractive frontperson whose addition to the band started playing up the sex appeal element. And I've seen many people complain about Alissa's presence in Arch Enemy, mostly pertaining to her sex appeal. It follows. It is not entirely disconnected from what the original poster was talking about.

And I don't appreciate being told I'm "out of my element" or that I have a "brain dead take" on something. If I'm wrong, why am I wrong? I'm not a bad person who regularly churns out misogynistic takes here. I'm nearly entirely in line with what most everybody here thinks in regards to social justice and all things pertaining to it - in fact, I've changed some of my stances to conform to the forum as a result of its influence on me. I know objectification or sexual imagery that's harmful when I see it and I'll label it as such when I see it. Now if I'm wrong about Arch Enemy and it wasn't Alissa's idea to bring obvious sex appeal to the band and/or she does it against her will, then I will think differently.
_________________
King_of_Arnor wrote:
I really don't want power metal riffing to turn into power metal yiffing any time soon.

Top
 Profile  
Forever Underground
Metalhead

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2018 7:35 am
Posts: 1151
Location: Galiza
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:09 pm 
 

Lord_Of_Diamonds wrote:
Now if I'm wrong about Arch Enemy and it wasn't Alissa's idea to bring obvious sex appeal to the band and/or she does it against her will, then I will think differently.

Being objectified as a marketing tool, even if it is consensual, is still wrong because it perpetuates the image of women as sexual objects above all other skills. How many comments have I seen about Alissa in the tone "Wow she sings so well and at the same time she's sexy she's the perfect woman" Are we really going to consider that as a positive thing if she is ok with it? I think we've matured enough to realise that we were lied to when we were told that a woman posing nude in a magazine was empowering for her and her sexuality, when in reality it was just an excuse for men to jerk off.
_________________
MetlaNZ wrote:
As I write this I'm mentally body slamming an innocent old lady walking down the street like that dude from Scatterbrain.

Top
 Profile  
Hecatomb867
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Aug 23, 2015 8:56 pm
Posts: 247
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:12 pm 
 

I mean... are we forgetting that Arch Enemy had an attractive female frontwoman for years before Alissa joined? I think it's really unfair to infer that it was Alissa's idea to bring sex appeal to Arch Enemy because, whether intentional or not, the band already had it.

Top
 Profile  
FrostOfTheBlack
Mallcore Kid

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 12:37 am
Posts: 13
Location: United States
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:35 pm 
 

Opus wrote:
That cover is incomprehensibly bad! So much that I refuse to have anything to do with that album. Second hand embarrassment.
Sex in rock n' roll - of course, sex in metal - absolutely not! Show me one example - outside Judas Priest - where this has been done successfully.


W.A.S.P. - W.A.S.P.

The cover art is not overtly sexual but the lyrics are very much so. Even though they are typically lumped in with the glam scene, this album is pretty much heavy metal.

Top
 Profile  
Lord_Of_Diamonds
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2018 5:23 pm
Posts: 1618
Location: United States
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:38 pm 
 

Forever Underground wrote:
Being objectified as a marketing tool, even if it is consensual, is still wrong because it perpetuates the image of women as sexual objects above all other skills. How many comments have I seen about Alissa in the tone "Wow she sings so well and at the same time she's sexy she's the perfect woman" Are we really going to consider that as a positive thing if she is ok with it? I think we've matured enough to realise that we were lied to when we were told that a woman posing nude in a magazine was empowering for her and her sexuality, when in reality it was just an excuse for men to jerk off.

You make a good point. Thanks.

I'm now curious about what kind of sexual imagery in music or musical performers is fine. How do you think you incorporate it in a way that's not problematic?
_________________
King_of_Arnor wrote:
I really don't want power metal riffing to turn into power metal yiffing any time soon.

Top
 Profile  
Metal_On_The_Ascendant
Veteran

Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 6:38 am
Posts: 2973
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 9:48 pm 
 

Lord_Of_Diamonds wrote:
Morrigan wrote:
...WTF does Arch Enemy having an attractive person as a band member have to do with what the OP is talking about

You're conflating topics, but again, I suppose I should not be surprised. You're out of your element, as always

The original poster was talking about sex appeal "ruining" an album if the band didn't really do that kind of image before, or just if sex appeal in general makes people think of an album as "juvenile". I went on to state how I thought that bands choosing to incorporate sexy imagery is not a problem unless it's creepy and how when I see people complain about sex in music they're usually prudes. When someone told me this was a "brain dead take" I rationalized myself and listed Arch Enemy as an easy example, because they have an attractive frontperson whose addition to the band started playing up the sex appeal element. And I've seen many people complain about Alissa's presence in Arch Enemy, mostly pertaining to her sex appeal. It follows. It is not entirely disconnected from what the original poster was talking about.

And I don't appreciate being told I'm "out of my element" or that I have a "brain dead take" on something. If I'm wrong, why am I wrong? I'm not a bad person who regularly churns out misogynistic takes here. I'm nearly entirely in line with what most everybody here thinks in regards to social justice and all things pertaining to it - in fact, I've changed some of my stances to conform to the forum as a result of its influence on me. I know objectification or sexual imagery that's harmful when I see it and I'll label it as such when I see it. Now if I'm wrong about Arch Enemy and it wasn't Alissa's idea to bring obvious sex appeal to the band and/or she does it against her will, then I will think differently.


You got called out for a bad take, stop crying.
You wrote, and I quote, "when I see people complain about sex in music, it's usually them just being prudes. Disliking a band purely or mostly because they incorporate sexy imagery is kinda stupid, especially since exaggerated sex appeal has been a part of rock music since it was invented."

Why are you still asking for clarification oh Lord of Diamonds?

Morrigan wrote:
Metal_On_The_Ascendant wrote:
Twisted_Psychology wrote:
I feel like sexual imagery in metal is best utilized by the metal bands playing music that sounds like it fucks


I'm afraid this point went over my head


Try this!

https://greyhazerecords.bandcamp.com/al ... al-carnage

:D


This rips, thanks!
_________________
DemonFilth2001 wrote:
Bahana loves a good Jesus band! Yes, he does!

Top
 Profile  
Opus
Metal freak

Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 11:06 am
Posts: 4266
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:12 pm 
 

Lord_Of_Diamonds wrote:
I'm now curious about what kind of sexual imagery in music or musical performers is fine. How do you think you incorporate it in a way that's not problematic?


Spoiler: show
_________________
Do the words Heavy Metal mean anything to you other than buttcore, technical progressive assgrind or the like?
true_death wrote:
You could be listening to Edge of Sanity right now, but you're not!

Top
 Profile  
Kyuashu
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 10:40 am
Posts: 30
Location: At the end of the world
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:17 pm 
 

Lord_Of_Diamonds wrote:
Forever Underground wrote:
Being objectified as a marketing tool, even if it is consensual, is still wrong because it perpetuates the image of women as sexual objects above all other skills. How many comments have I seen about Alissa in the tone "Wow she sings so well and at the same time she's sexy she's the perfect woman" Are we really going to consider that as a positive thing if she is ok with it? I think we've matured enough to realise that we were lied to when we were told that a woman posing nude in a magazine was empowering for her and her sexuality, when in reality it was just an excuse for men to jerk off.

You make a good point. Thanks.

I'm now curious about what kind of sexual imagery in music or musical performers is fine. How do you think you incorporate it in a way that's not problematic?


There's more to sex than carnal desire. Two of my favourite songs (that weren't written written in English so there's little point in sharing them) are both sexual in nature but they both cover a wide spectrum of emotions, from anger to insecurity to frustration to fear to joy to comfort and, yes, the act itself, which is portrayed in an intimate manner and is more about the way the pair have bonded and in a way merged into one - while also retaining that animalistic edge of emotional outpour.

METALCORE WARNING Another good example is The End to a Brief Moment of Lasting Intimacy by SeeYouSpaceCowboy which is about hookups and trying to find comfort and safety in another person through sex. It also has a very sexual and very gay music video that I don't think I've watched because I don't really like music videos, but it's probably quite good if it deals with the subject manner as seriously as the lyrics do.
_________________
HighwayCorsair wrote:
i think we have a fundamental difference here in that i think that you're deaf

Top
 Profile  
Neurological Outsourcing
Metal newbie

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:10 pm
Posts: 32
Location: United States
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:45 pm 
 

By far the most offensive thing in the video you mention is the bass player's technique.

Top
 Profile  
CoffeeCat
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 9:09 am
Posts: 338
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 12:42 am 
 

.
_________________
Black Lives Matter and ACAB
Trans Rights Are Human Rights
Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights


Last edited by CoffeeCat on Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
Ace_Rimmer
Metal freak

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2017 11:30 am
Posts: 4606
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 1:39 am 
 

I have zero problems with sex appeal on album art, etc. It doesn't really do anything to change my opinions of the music. Using looks to help sell the band doesn't bother me either, but its not going to save a shit band for me. I can see plenty of beautiful women if I desire and not sit though mediocre music at the same time.

Top
 Profile  
AWinterShadow
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:13 pm
Posts: 120
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:00 am 
 

As far as that cover goes...there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. I don't find it exploitive, crass or offensive. The art is reasonably well drawn and if one of the ladies garments is sheer enough to show some boob/nipple, it's nothing to get all wrung out about. Given the Band Name and the White/Black color palatte, there's some implied evil/good, heaven/hell alluding going on but thats about it....unless *gasp*, your offended by the implication that they look like they just might be about to lock lips? In a *eeek* passionate manner perhaps?! ZOMG call the priests, bring out the torture implements and hide the childen! How dare they!

"Puritanical Euphoric Misanthropia" was never more an appropriate title for an album than ever. (Even if I don't care for the band/music that much, this title is pure truth.)

Top
 Profile  
morbert
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2007 2:36 am
Posts: 1276
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:07 am 
 

As if a band with a hot male vocalist isn't something the girls can't appreciate.
There are way too many ugly guys in metal, face it hahaa.

I love the eroticism in early Cradle of Filth artwork, that Bram Stoker vibe
_________________
Magna res est vocis et silentii temperamentum.

Top
 Profile  
AuthorOfWoh
Metal newbie

Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2022 1:52 pm
Posts: 66
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:52 am 
 

AWinterShadow wrote:
As far as that cover goes...there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. I don't find it exploitive, crass or offensive. The art is reasonably well drawn and if one of the ladies garments is sheer enough to show some boob/nipple, it's nothing to get all wrung out about. Given the Band Name and the White/Black color palatte, there's some implied evil/good, heaven/hell alluding going on but thats about it....unless *gasp*, your offended by the implication that they look like they just might be about to lock lips? In a *eeek* passionate manner perhaps?! ZOMG call the priests, bring out the torture implements and hide the childen! How dare they!

"Puritanical Euphoric Misanthropia" was never more an appropriate title for an album than ever. (Even if I don't care for the band/music that much, this title is pure truth.)


It's fucking tacky, backward and has been done a thousand times before. But enjoy your stupid things, I guess.

If you want to depict sex in metal then why not have art depicting demons and such in a sexual manner - that's more in line with the themes of extreme metal anyway. Having two "hot girls" kissing up on your album cover or posing scantily is merely taking from the already established form of rock/pop to entice horny idiots into buying your stuff. It's rather pathetic.

Top
 Profile  
Red_Death
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 12:51 pm
Posts: 1035
Location: Croatia
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 11:11 am 
 

Lord_Of_Diamonds wrote:
I know objectification or sexual imagery that's harmful when I see it and I'll label it as such when I see it. Now if I'm wrong about Arch Enemy and it wasn't Alissa's idea to bring obvious sex appeal to the band and/or she does it against her will, then I will think differently.

Arch Enemy's actually a good example of sex appeal as marketing strategy.

You can approach it from different angles. As far as I'm concerned, it's just something clearly tacked onto the overall music+lyrics, completely disconnected from all aspects of the latter. I don't have a problem with it because I'm a prude, but rather because of the sheer meaninglessness of it all (there's no meaning in coming up with another layer of attention-grabbing elements when your music is fucking shit; the whole point of it is directed to and dependent on very basic customer preference stuff that doesn't have anything to do with your art). It's completely superfluous, irrelevant, surface-level stuff really.

What would the wider metal world gain if more bands followed this path?

It's a whole other deal what social effects this has on metal's predominantly male audience (and prospective women artists?).
_________________
And Darkness and Decay and the Red Death held illimitable dominion over all.

Top
 Profile  
CoffeeCat
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 9:09 am
Posts: 338
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 12:11 pm 
 

.
_________________
Black Lives Matter and ACAB
Trans Rights Are Human Rights
Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights


Last edited by CoffeeCat on Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
Neurological Outsourcing
Metal newbie

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:10 pm
Posts: 32
Location: United States
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:40 pm 
 

CoffeeCat what's your take on Brojob?

They're one of the most extreme, sexual, gay, and sometimes emotional bands I can think of.

Top
 Profile  
Metal_On_The_Ascendant
Veteran

Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 6:38 am
Posts: 2973
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 3:46 pm 
 

Neurological Outsourcing wrote:
CoffeeCat what's your take on Brojob?

They're one of the most extreme, sexual, gay, and sometimes emotional bands I can think of.


Riiiiiiight....with songs titled "The Incel Anthem" and "Extra Thicc". It's cool if people enjoy this sort of jokey meme-type bands but fuck it's so cringey (literal body cringing after looking them up) - where's the "emotional" anything in that??
_________________
DemonFilth2001 wrote:
Bahana loves a good Jesus band! Yes, he does!

Top
 Profile  
Neurological Outsourcing
Metal newbie

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:10 pm
Posts: 32
Location: United States
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 4:21 pm 
 

Metal_On_The_Ascendant wrote:
where's the "emotional" anything in that??

Their entire second album. The only track without emotional lyrics is the last one, which is instrumental and its title is the (now former) phone number for the suicide prevention hotline.

Top
 Profile  
yung_souichi
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:49 pm
Posts: 77
Location: inner periphery
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 5:49 pm 
 

DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
If done sparingly, it's not too much of a turn off.

And I know you said to ignore glam, but Steel Panther's sex pandering is so completely disgustingly over the top it makes Motley Crue seem downright family friendly.

But what I REALLY have a problem with is lyrics in certain brutal death metal and grindcore bands where they sing about dismembering women, and especially when they add sexual elements to that mess. That to me is way, way, WAY worse than something like, "Baby I want you to squeeze my lemon, til the juice rolls down my leg."



Those bands are way less inclined to actually do any of that shit whereas there's a reason every hair band had lyrics like 'hey baby, you're 14, you know what I mean'
_________________
[deep voice] 'Do you have any fucking cocaine?'

Miss Amerikkka? Only parasites will

Top
 Profile  
DoomMetalAlchemist
Veteran

Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 6:10 am
Posts: 2860
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2023 6:13 pm 
 

yung_souichi wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
If done sparingly, it's not too much of a turn off.

And I know you said to ignore glam, but Steel Panther's sex pandering is so completely disgustingly over the top it makes Motley Crue seem downright family friendly.

But what I REALLY have a problem with is lyrics in certain brutal death metal and grindcore bands where they sing about dismembering women, and especially when they add sexual elements to that mess. That to me is way, way, WAY worse than something like, "Baby I want you to squeeze my lemon, til the juice rolls down my leg."



Those bands are way less inclined to actually do any of that shit whereas there's a reason every hair band had lyrics like 'hey baby, you're 14, you know what I mean'


I really hate to admit it, but you've got a point.

Top
 Profile  
Metal Shark
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:54 am
Posts: 1066
Location: United States
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 1:05 am 
 

*Obligatory Spinal Tap "What's Wrong With Being Sexy?" Quote*

Top
 Profile  
yung_souichi
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:49 pm
Posts: 77
Location: inner periphery
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 1:18 am 
 

DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
yung_souichi wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
If done sparingly, it's not too much of a turn off.

And I know you said to ignore glam, but Steel Panther's sex pandering is so completely disgustingly over the top it makes Motley Crue seem downright family friendly.

But what I REALLY have a problem with is lyrics in certain brutal death metal and grindcore bands where they sing about dismembering women, and especially when they add sexual elements to that mess. That to me is way, way, WAY worse than something like, "Baby I want you to squeeze my lemon, til the juice rolls down my leg."



Those bands are way less inclined to actually do any of that shit whereas there's a reason every hair band had lyrics like 'hey baby, you're 14, you know what I mean'


I really hate to admit it, but you've got a point.


As fucked up as like, Nuclear Death lyrics or something can be, at the end of the day it's a fuckin horror story.
_________________
[deep voice] 'Do you have any fucking cocaine?'

Miss Amerikkka? Only parasites will

Top
 Profile  
MetlaNZ
Veteran

Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 6:45 pm
Posts: 2697
Location: Lost in Necropolis
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 4:05 am 
 

If you're looking for some real, genuine sex appeal in a band, album, songs and album cover, then look no further than the sexiest of them all, Mentors "You Axed For It!".
https://youtu.be/uaJJX8UrIHE

Top
 Profile  
Metal_On_The_Ascendant
Veteran

Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 6:38 am
Posts: 2973
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 12:29 pm 
 

Neurological Outsourcing wrote:
Metal_On_The_Ascendant wrote:
where's the "emotional" anything in that??

Their entire second album. The only track without emotional lyrics is the last one, which is instrumental and its title is the (now former) phone number for the suicide prevention hotline.


Oh....okay.

Still can't get over what a terrible band name Brojob is but whatever
_________________
DemonFilth2001 wrote:
Bahana loves a good Jesus band! Yes, he does!

Top
 Profile  
yungstirjoey666
Metalhead

Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2019 8:47 am
Posts: 639
Location: United States
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 1:41 pm 
 

I just wonder why many male musicians nowadays look more bland. A lot of it is just cargo pants and black band shirts. At least power metal has some fashion, even if it can get goofy.


Last edited by yungstirjoey666 on Fri Jan 27, 2023 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
Nocturnal_Evil
Metalhead

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2021 12:00 am
Posts: 668
Location: United States
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 2:34 pm 
 

Deg wrote:
talk about a couple of butterfaces. cover those up and i could rip one out to that album cover


I don't know, man. They aren't that bad to me.

But yeah, using sex to sell music is generally pretty low. One of the reasons metal stands alone to me is because (for the most part) it has never felt the need to do that. If you're into this stuff, it's because you're into the music first and foremost (because lord knows you're not gonna be attracting anyone by playing brutal death metal or black metal!). Using sex to sell stuff is like slapping expensive, nice looking paint on a shit car so that people will buy it.
_________________
Metal_On_The_Ascendant wrote:
YEEEEP DIS DAT FAKE BATUSHKA


Last edited by Nocturnal_Evil on Fri Jan 27, 2023 2:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
CoffeeCat
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2022 9:09 am
Posts: 338
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 2:37 pm 
 

.
_________________
Black Lives Matter and ACAB
Trans Rights Are Human Rights
Reproductive Rights Are Human Rights


Last edited by CoffeeCat on Wed Jun 28, 2023 11:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
 Profile  
AWinterShadow
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:13 pm
Posts: 120
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 2:58 pm 
 

AuthorOfWoh wrote:
AWinterShadow wrote:
As far as that cover goes...there's absolutely nothing wrong with it. I don't find it exploitive, crass or offensive. The art is reasonably well drawn and if one of the ladies garments is sheer enough to show some boob/nipple, it's nothing to get all wrung out about. Given the Band Name and the White/Black color palatte, there's some implied evil/good, heaven/hell alluding going on but thats about it....unless *gasp*, your offended by the implication that they look like they just might be about to lock lips? In a *eeek* passionate manner perhaps?! ZOMG call the priests, bring out the torture implements and hide the childen! How dare they!

"Puritanical Euphoric Misanthropia" was never more an appropriate title for an album than ever. (Even if I don't care for the band/music that much, this title is pure truth.)


It's fucking tacky, backward and has been done a thousand times before. But enjoy your stupid things, I guess.

If you want to depict sex in metal then why not have art depicting demons and such in a sexual manner - that's more in line with the themes of extreme metal anyway. Having two "hot girls" kissing up on your album cover or posing scantily is merely taking from the already established form of rock/pop to entice horny idiots into buying your stuff. It's rather pathetic.


Tacky? The art isn't that bad. Cliche at worst. But I took one look at it and from the art alone I could immediately identify the band would be playing either Power Metal or some type of Heavy Metal, since I'd never even heard of them before. A quick check of the archives and they are from France, so no surprise I hadn't heard of them yet. A a short visit to youtube to confirm, yup this is power metal and my guess at what they would sound like was pretty much 95% spot on without ever hearing them before.

And given the songs/lyrics, the design/art pretty much evokes exactly what I expected. Are they dropping 'sexy' lyrics on every song? No. Are they misrepresenting their 'content'? Again I would say no. Is the art kinda 'sexy'? It's not Luis Ruyo, but it's resonably evocative of something that's a little racy, but not much else. Are their album full of 'sexy covers' to deceive buyers? No given that the previous albums had covers more in line with Death Metal or Thrash, other than their debut...I'd say this cover is more representative of their sound than the previous 'horror/demon/evil' covers were.

In short, there's nothing wrong here....unless of course you've conditioned yourself to immediately equate anything that shows a woman as 'sexy' as something shameful and only exists to incite uncontrollable lust in any 'horny idiot'.

In fact I find it more offensive that you feel they need to have demons engaging in sex to "Be in line with extreme metal". But thats exactly it, their not 'extreme metal' are they? They are a power metal band, not death metal, not grindcore, not black metal, etc, etc.. So having a sexy but not even 'softcore' cover is 100% in line with what they are doing.

Top
 Profile  
Tanuki
Metalhead

Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:36 pm
Posts: 425
Location: United Kingdom
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 3:20 pm 
 

This got me looking through my own personal collection to see how often I've been - subconsciously or otherwise - swayed by sexy album covers. Looking at my collection in alphabetical/chronological order caused this to happen, which I've been giggling at for the past ten or so minutes.
Spoiler: show
Image
Image

But yeah, for me, I mostly only have good albums that just so happen to have lewd album art. Better Than Raw, Vanishing Vision, Master of Disguise... And the latter two in particular I wish had variant covers. I wanna recommend this shit to my friends and family, y'know? OP bringing up Heavenly is interesting because I own both Carpe Diem and Virus, and Virus is a billion times better. But alas, because Virus only has a "We have Eddie the Head at home" album cover, a lot of folks will probably skip right over it, go straight to Carpe Diem, and conclude Heavenly sucks. A cryin'-ass shame, but hey, you live by the pants-sword, you die by the pants-sword.

Top
 Profile  
kkingccrimson
Metal newbie

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2014 6:27 pm
Posts: 51
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 5:53 pm 
 

ChildClownOutlet wrote:
So I've been listening to Heavenly, always been a huge fan of these guys. Though I've noticed on their last album "Carpe Diem," which depicts....
Image

Now I'm not going to debate the ratings, which is a lot lower than their earlier albums(it's a fantastic album honestly but MA disagrees,) but even the comments on their single "Lost in your Eyes," I've seen comments regarding "guys you changed, were the dancing skimpy girls really necessary?" This poses a question that I thought about, can sex or videos/lyrics about sex ruin an album if the band usually never incorporates those sort of things in their songs? Do you usually look at these sort of album covers and go "yeah this is juvenile," or do these make you curious enough to see if you've got a hidden gem in there? And I don't mean the sleazy glam rock sort of style.


Wow.i had completely forgotten about Heavenly.I have not thought about them in years.I regret getting rid of Dust to Dust.

Top
 Profile  
Empyreal
The Final Frontier

Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:58 pm
Posts: 35183
Location: Where the dead rule the night
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 7:30 pm 
 

AWinterShadow wrote:
In short, there's nothing wrong here....unless of course you've conditioned yourself to immediately equate anything that shows a woman as 'sexy' as something shameful and only exists to incite uncontrollable lust in any 'horny idiot'.


Well the issue is that you've made this into a binary where it's either "you have absolutely zero issues with that cover" or "you're a prude conservative" with nothing else in between. Bad faith discussion to start with here.

It's not bad because it has boobs or women kissing, it just looks like something a 14 year old would think is cool and no one any older than that.
_________________
Cinema Freaks latest reviews: Black Roses
Fictional Works - if you hated my reviews over the years then pay me back by reviewing my own stuff
Official Website

Top
 Profile  
yung_souichi
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:49 pm
Posts: 77
Location: inner periphery
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2023 11:34 pm 
 

CoffeeCat wrote:
yungstirjoey666 wrote:
I just wonder why many male musicians nowadays look more bland. A lot of it is just cargo pants and black band shirts.

At least in North America, men's fashion has become increasingly boring since the 80s in general, and in the last decade has really trended towards dark and muted colours and projection of "manliness." Bright colours, cool hair, makeup, etc. are all super rare outside of very specific spaces and subcultures. It fees like there's like 3 or 4 officially-sanctioned outfits and colour schemes guys can wear these days without raising eyebrows (can you guess which?!).

Not to turn things overly political, but I'm sure you could link some of that to the rise of toxic masculinity in certain countries, as well as the increasing sway of the alt-right.


I don't think the alt-right is responsible for the t-shirt and cargo shorts look every death metal band seems to have.

There's some truth however in that metal, pretty much since it's inception, has been coded as 'male' (same way it's coded as 'white', tho obviously this is not true across the board). Metal, like all musical genres, is a product of the society it emerged from.
_________________
[deep voice] 'Do you have any fucking cocaine?'

Miss Amerikkka? Only parasites will

Top
 Profile  
Scorntyrant
Metalhead

Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 5:55 am
Posts: 1516
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 3:05 am 
 

CoffeeCat wrote:
I don't think the alt-right is responsible for the t-shirt and cargo shorts look every death metal band seems to have.


At least where I live, that's a factor of the climate rather than anything else. Gets a bit warm in Australia this time of year, especially in a room full of people and under hot stage lights. Everyone gave Uada shit for complaining about the heat in Mexico that time, but I've seen people pass out on stage from heat stress trying to play in elaborate stage get-ups here, and my experiences playing in summer under the lights even in jeans/boots/cut-off t-shirt have been physically uncomfortable to say the very least. That "look" is what everyone wears the 6 months of the year when it's not cold enough to wear jeans and a hoodie for purely utilitarian reasons, and the rest of society is doing something similar in their own style - boardshorts and singlet, chino shorts and polo or whatever, because you have to adapt to the ambient temperature.

Anyway, regarding the question at hand, I think that kind of blatant fan-service/pandering is largely pretty tacky and I'm nobody's idea of prudish. I think much of it followed on the success of early COF and neglected the fact that Nigel Wingrove was a fairly accomplished photographer & visual designer aside from "hey, look, boobs! Buy our shit!". I don't quite want to say "Eurotrash" given that his film distribution work was steeped in 70's European sleaze like Jean Rollin and Jess Franco, but you cant help but look at the artwork Napalm Records put out and think that.
_________________
Mike_Tyson wrote:
"I think the average person thinks I'm a fucking nut and I deserve whatever happens to me."

"My intentions were not to fascinate the world with my personality."

Top
 Profile  
yung_souichi
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:49 pm
Posts: 77
Location: inner periphery
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 3:38 am 
 

Scorntyrant wrote:
CoffeeCat wrote:
I don't think the alt-right is responsible for the t-shirt and cargo shorts look every death metal band seems to have.


At least where I live, that's a factor of the climate rather than anything else. Gets a bit warm in Australia this time of year, especially in a room full of people and under hot stage lights. Everyone gave Uada shit for complaining about the heat in Mexico that time, but I've seen people pass out on stage from heat stress trying to play in elaborate stage get-ups here, and my experiences playing in summer under the lights even in jeans/boots/cut-off t-shirt have been physically uncomfortable to say the very least. That "look" is what everyone wears the 6 months of the year when it's not cold enough to wear jeans and a hoodie for purely utilitarian reasons, and the rest of society is doing something similar in their own style - boardshorts and singlet, chino shorts and polo or whatever, because you have to adapt to the ambient temperature.

Anyway, regarding the question at hand, I think that kind of blatant fan-service/pandering is largely pretty tacky and I'm nobody's idea of prudish. I think much of it followed on the success of early COF and neglected the fact that Nigel Wingrove was a fairly accomplished photographer & visual designer aside from "hey, look, boobs! Buy our shit!". I don't quite want to say "Eurotrash" given that his film distribution work was steeped in 70's European sleaze like Jean Rollin and Jess Franco, but you cant help but look at the artwork Napalm Records put out and think that.


There's an anecdote Lori Bravo tells in an interview where she had I guess put some plastic vampire teeth in her vagina (or crotch at least, kind of unclear) and took pictures as promo material or something for Carrion but those photos got lost somehow. That I can kind of approve of to be honest, if you're gonna do that kind of stuff, it should have an edge to it or something and not just be like 100% idiotic male teen sexuality.
_________________
[deep voice] 'Do you have any fucking cocaine?'

Miss Amerikkka? Only parasites will

Top
 Profile  
AWinterShadow
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:13 pm
Posts: 120
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 8:22 am 
 

Empyreal wrote:
AWinterShadow wrote:
In short, there's nothing wrong here....unless of course you've conditioned yourself to immediately equate anything that shows a woman as 'sexy' as something shameful and only exists to incite uncontrollable lust in any 'horny idiot'.


Well the issue is that you've made this into a binary where it's either "you have absolutely zero issues with that cover" or "you're a prude conservative" with nothing else in between. Bad faith discussion to start with here.

It's not bad because it has boobs or women kissing, it just looks like something a 14 year old would think is cool and no one any older than that.


Ow. That's the pain I get from the whiplash of trying to point out how low the bar has been set only to be told I'm the one who set the bar that low....my point was that *any* level of female attractiveness in media is basically tarred and feathered with the same brush these days and it's stupid.

And countering with only 14 year old's would like it is just a plain straw man argument...unless you want to argue that Bomber Plane Nose Art in WWII was painted by 14 year olds? Or all the pinups and cheesecake calendars were only ever meant to appeal to that same level of maturity as well. And that's roughly where the quality of the art sits to me. It's clean, well proportioned and the actual 'sexy' part is PG-13 at worst.

You would have more of an argument if you were talking about using a Bikini Model trying to sell Doritos, but this is just a Album cover, something that is representative of what the music is trying to evoke. And I have to say it fits the music and lyrics reasonably well, even if not for every single song.

Complaining that the band used this type of artwork is just another example of elitism. "True XYZ bands don't use babes to sell records!" or "XYZ stopped singing about gore, satanism and misanthropy...they must be sell outs!"

So play sexy song, have sexy cover. There's nothing really out of order here. No, the ones that are unquestionably using sexiness to sell something that isn't, that is where I draw the line. So Metal = No Problem. But something like a Classical Album by Orchestra playing a selection of Bach/Handel/Murgovsky/etc... Now THAT is trying to cheaply use sex to sell something. And sadly that is a real example. I don't recall the series, but it was in the very late 90's early 00's when I last heard of that type of thing.

Top
 Profile  
Opus
Metal freak

Joined: Sun Sep 22, 2002 11:06 am
Posts: 4266
Location: Sweden
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 10:29 am 
 

AWinterShadow wrote:
But something like a Classical Album by Orchestra playing a selection of Bach/Handel/Murgovsky/etc... Now THAT is trying to cheaply use sex to sell something. And sadly that is a real example. I don't recall the series, but it was in the very late 90's early 00's when I last heard of that type of thing.

How is that different? Händel's music can be sexy (not to mention Murgovsky, that dirty old bastard). Bach had 20 children, so he must have had some interest in sex. Can't a classical snob enjoy a pair of nice titties for what they are? I wonder who's the prude here?
_________________
Do the words Heavy Metal mean anything to you other than buttcore, technical progressive assgrind or the like?
true_death wrote:
You could be listening to Edge of Sanity right now, but you're not!

Top
 Profile  
yung_souichi
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat May 22, 2021 10:49 pm
Posts: 77
Location: inner periphery
PostPosted: Sat Jan 28, 2023 3:29 pm 
 

kkingccrimson wrote:
ChildClownOutlet wrote:
So I've been listening to Heavenly, always been a huge fan of these guys. Though I've noticed on their last album "Carpe Diem," which depicts....
Image

Now I'm not going to debate the ratings, which is a lot lower than their earlier albums(it's a fantastic album honestly but MA disagrees,) but even the comments on their single "Lost in your Eyes," I've seen comments regarding "guys you changed, were the dancing skimpy girls really necessary?" This poses a question that I thought about, can sex or videos/lyrics about sex ruin an album if the band usually never incorporates those sort of things in their songs? Do you usually look at these sort of album covers and go "yeah this is juvenile," or do these make you curious enough to see if you've got a hidden gem in there? And I don't mean the sleazy glam rock sort of style.


Wow.i had completely forgotten about Heavenly.I have not thought about them in years.I regret getting rid of Dust to Dust.


Image

I think my question really is, why do so many of these covers look like ads for these shitty mobile games?

I'm waiting for the day furries discover power metal en masse and the hilarious album covers that will produce.
_________________
[deep voice] 'Do you have any fucking cocaine?'

Miss Amerikkka? Only parasites will

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Thornium2002 and 63 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

  Print view
Jump to:  

Back to the Encyclopaedia Metallum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group