Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
https://forum.metal-archives.com/

AMG takes on Nazis
https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=133985
Page 2 of 5

Author:  Ex El Ex El Ex [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 10:32 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

BastardHead wrote:
Every day I find myself shocked that the position of "White supremacy is bad and is inherently based on violence towards marginalized groups, therefore it is bad to give positive coverage to things associated with such ideologies because it leads, directly and indirectly, to financial support for people and organizations who inflict said violence towards marginalized people" would be controversial or worth snarky dismissals, but that's the metal scene for ya I guess.

The metal scene proves yet again to be the worst part of metal.

Also, ALL NAZIS ARE CUUUUUNTS.

Author:  ModusOperandi [ Sun Jan 09, 2022 11:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

I'm familiar with AMG from the name and their reach but were never a devoted reader or follower or anything. Still, good on them for the transparency. Hell yeah.

The real gold to be mined is the weirdo M-A lurkers that come out of the woodwork when these topics or their adjacents come up in discussion. They're already here, any more?

Fingolfin76 wrote:
I hate fascists and nazi but I like their music I never have a moral problem to hear them…

Something about this smells like some bull-to-the-shit but gosh golly willickers, I can't quite put my middle finger on it.

Author:  Speed Metal Terror [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:21 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

These kinds of threads always bring out the "amusing" people. *gets popcorn*

Author:  ~Guest 1423526 [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 5:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

ModusOperandi wrote:

Fingolfin76 wrote:
I hate fascists and nazi but I like their music I never have a moral problem to hear them…

Something about this smells like some bull-to-the-shit but gosh golly willickers, I can't quite put my middle finger on it.

Jajajaja

Maybe you listen worse than me so I put my middle finger on it

Author:  In_Zane [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 6:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Ex El Ex El Ex wrote:
ALL NAZIS ARE CUUUUUNTS.

That's not fair to cunts...

I don't think nazis have the depth nor capacity to give pleasure.

Author:  ~Guest 1423526 [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 6:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…

Author:  MetlaNZ [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 6:30 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Speed Metal Terror wrote:
These kinds of threads always bring out the "amusing" people. *gets popcorn*

Just grabbed a six pack. I'll trade ya one for some popcorn. Thread party tonight.

Author:  Ex El Ex El Ex [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 10:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Fingolfin76 wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…

What are you even trying to gripe about here? Please provide a coherent argument at least if you're gonna complain about what other people have to say.

Author:  pyratebastard [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

BastardHead wrote:
Every day I find myself shocked that the position of "White supremacy is bad and is inherently based on violence towards marginalized groups, therefore it is bad to give positive coverage to things associated with such ideologies because it leads, directly and indirectly, to financial support for people and organizations who inflict said violence towards marginalized people" would be controversial or worth snarky dismissals, but that's the metal scene for ya I guess.


This is quality bastardry.

And yes, I have to agree that it is also depressing how many people seem to have forgotten the meaning of 'censorship'. The simple fact that we are all talking about something that exists and is legal and readily available for consumption means that it is not censored. I'm not censoring fucking pickles when I ask for my cheeseburgers to be served without pickles. I just don't like pickles, and much like that nsbm bullshit, they leave a foul taste on everything they come into contact with.

If anybody wants to fight about pickles, I'm all for it. I'd much rather fight about pickles than about whether some humans deserve to live or not.

Author:  HeavenDuff [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:46 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

pyratebastard wrote:
BastardHead wrote:
Every day I find myself shocked that the position of "White supremacy is bad and is inherently based on violence towards marginalized groups, therefore it is bad to give positive coverage to things associated with such ideologies because it leads, directly and indirectly, to financial support for people and organizations who inflict said violence towards marginalized people" would be controversial or worth snarky dismissals, but that's the metal scene for ya I guess.


This is quality bastardry.

And yes, I have to agree that it is also depressing how many people seem to have forgotten the meaning of 'censorship'. The simple fact that we are all talking about something that exists and is legal and readily available for consumption means that it is not censored. I'm not censoring fucking pickles when I ask for my cheeseburgers to be served without pickles. I just don't like pickles, and much like that nsbm bullshit, they leave a foul taste on everything they come into contact with.

If anybody wants to fight about pickles, I'm all for it. I'd much rather fight about pickles than about whether some humans deserve to live or not.


That's not fair to pickles, bro. Comparing them to neo-nazis...

Author:  Lagartija [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 11:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

pp3088 wrote:
Akhlys is a nazi band right now? Funny :D

Everyone is a nazi band right now, apparently.

Author:  Lagartija [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Rottir wrote:
On a scale of 1-10 nazis, where 1 is having toured with Mgla and 10 is running their own DIY gas chamber in the Finnish wilderness, how many Nazis is Inquisition? More importantly, how many of their albums do I not have to buy before we have solved Nazism?

:-D

Author:  LordOfTheGallows [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Lagartija wrote:
pp3088 wrote:
Akhlys is a nazi band right now? Funny :D

Everyone is a nazi band right now, apparently.


As stated earlier in this thread (with photo evidence of the man behind it hanging out with guys that have white supremacy patches and shirts no less) he's very comfortable with fascist imagery and sympathies. It's like Sargeist, that band doesn't have any nazi garbage in it's songs or imagery but the main guy behind it absolutely is.

Fuck Nazi sympathy.

Author:  henkkjelle [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Ex El Ex El Ex wrote:
Fingolfin76 wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…

What are you even trying to gripe about here? Please provide a coherent argument at least if you're gonna complain about what other people have to say.


I think he's saying that compared to nazism/fascism in black metal, politicians like Meloni and Salvini pose a far greater threat? I guess that's a pretty true statement but it's also an useless one to make because ya know, you can be against both perfectly fine.

Author:  Ex El Ex El Ex [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

I guess that's what happens when you literally have only one fuck to give. Personally, I have enough to tell both groups to fuck off.

Author:  Gravetemplar [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 12:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

I guess I'll do nothing about the sewer rats and cockroaches infesting my house since they aren't as dangerous as leopards!

Author:  ~Guest 1423526 [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 4:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Ex El Ex El Ex wrote:
Fingolfin76 wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…

What are you even trying to gripe about here? Please provide a coherent argument at least if you're gonna complain about what other people have to say.

Coherent?

Maybe you must read all discussion and all my post then we can talk

Author:  Morrigan [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 4:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Miikja wrote:
Seriously, I did ONE search on the guy and this is my first result:

Spoiler: show
Image


But whatever, "that doesn't mean he's a nazi". Wake up.

Why do all of these fuckheads always look the same :lol:

Image

narsilianshard wrote:
pp3088 wrote:
Akhlys is a nazi band right now? Funny :D

Why is that funny? Kyle has put out multiple splits with bands with swastikas and celtic crosses in their logos, released on NSBM labels, and even wrote a song called "For Blood and Soil".

Image

Author:  TheEtreum [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 6:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Image

Author:  CrippledLucifer [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

TheEtreum wrote:
Spoiler: show
Image

Image

Author:  doomicus [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

I feel like if we created a dumb ass nsbm apologist/excuse M-A bingo, this thread would get a cover all.

Author:  Nicencold [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.


Except a rose by any other name... There are few things more insufferable than leftists who use technicalities to enforce censorship. All this handwringing is so lame. If you have a problem with something don't pursue it. If you feel the need to prevent others from making that choice you're doing freedom wrong. Just don't cover what you don't want to cover. If they feel the need to make a huge statement about it then it's more about them then their cause. Casual condemnation is lame as well. I wonder how many of these people do virtue backgound checks for more than just the art they consume. Like are you sure the guy who fixed your toilet doesn't like Inquisition?

Author:  Empyreal [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Nicencold wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.


Except a rose by any other name... There are few things more insufferable than leftists who use technicalities to enforce censorship. All this handwringing is so lame. If you have a problem with something don't pursue it. If you feel the need to prevent others from making that choice you're doing freedom wrong. Just don't cover what you don't want to cover. If they feel the need to make a huge statement about it then it's more about them then their cause. Casual condemnation is lame as well. I wonder how many of these people do virtue backgound checks for more than just the art they consume. Like are you sure the guy who fixed your toilet doesn't like Inquisition?


Nobody is preventing anybody from doing anything. People saying they don't want to consume some media isn't preventing you from listening to whatever swastika covered shit flinging band of worthless morons you want to. Just shut the fuck up and quit hyperventilating over these nonsensical scenarios and being a baby about it, fucking christ.

If the government isn't preventing you from experiencing some kind of speech then you have nothing to worry about. An op ed from some random metal site isn't censorship. But keep on panicking I guess.

Author:  CrippledLucifer [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Nicencold wrote:
Just don't cover what you don't want to cover.

Isn't that exactly what AMG is doing?

Nicencold wrote:
If you feel the need to prevent others from making that choice you're doing freedom wrong.

I mean you can still freely open youtube or spotify and freely listen to Inquisition or Akhlys so it doesn't seem to me like that one dude's metal blog is doing any active effort to prevent you from freely listening to nazi shit on the internet. That or they are doing very poorly at it.

Author:  Gravetemplar [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Nicencold wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.


Except a rose by any other name... There are few things more insufferable than leftists who use technicalities to enforce censorship. All this handwringing is so lame. If you have a problem with something don't pursue it. If you feel the need to prevent others from making that choice you're doing freedom wrong. Just don't cover what you don't want to cover. If they feel the need to make a huge statement about it then it's more about them then their cause. Casual condemnation is lame as well. I wonder how many of these people do virtue backgound checks for more than just the art they consume. Like are you sure the guy who fixed your toilet doesn't like Inquisition?

You just proved his point. You have no fucking clue what "censorship" means.

Author:  doomicus [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

I really fail to see how anyone in this thread is trying to prevent anyone from listening to what they want to. People are just giving information, that is readily available I might add, so others can make decisions on what they want to listen to using that information (or not if that's their prerogative). Some folks care about the background and involvement of bands they listen to and like knowing, others don't. It's really as simple as that.

Author:  Bingewolf [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 7:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Fingolfin76 wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…


Being that you are witnessing the rise of fascism in Italy right now, it seems odd to me that you wouldn't take more seriously the normalization of extreme ideas. Think of it like this, a kid grows up on the internet listening to black metal... they just keep finding more and more extreme stuff and find their way to the nsbm world. Not only are they being exposed to NS ideology, but they're in a corner of the internet that chest puffs and thinks that these ideas are a sign of masculinity and power. They find an identity in that - they also find a "brotherhood" amongst the other nazis.

HeavenDuff wrote:
That's not fair to pickles, bro. Comparing them to neo-nazis...


It's so much more obvious to pick mayo for the comparison... fat, white, gross, always trying to overpower everything else in the burger.... :lol:

Author:  Twisted_Psychology [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

If I was on the AMG staff, I would just be basking in my imaginary power at this point. As Nazi metalloids want to think a metal blog is enforcing a tyrannical regime, you might as well just make the most of it.

Author:  LycanthropeMoon [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Empyreal wrote:
Nicencold wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.


Except a rose by any other name... There are few things more insufferable than leftists who use technicalities to enforce censorship. All this handwringing is so lame. If you have a problem with something don't pursue it. If you feel the need to prevent others from making that choice you're doing freedom wrong. Just don't cover what you don't want to cover. If they feel the need to make a huge statement about it then it's more about them then their cause. Casual condemnation is lame as well. I wonder how many of these people do virtue backgound checks for more than just the art they consume. Like are you sure the guy who fixed your toilet doesn't like Inquisition?


Nobody is preventing anybody from doing anything. People saying they don't want to consume some media isn't preventing you from listening to whatever swastika covered shit flinging band of worthless morons you want to. Just shut the fuck up and quit hyperventilating over these nonsensical scenarios and being a baby about it, fucking christ.

If the government isn't preventing you from experiencing some kind of speech then you have nothing to worry about. An op ed from some random metal site isn't censorship. But keep on panicking I guess.

Suddenly I'm reminded of when someone on this very forum accused me of trying to cancel Moonsorrow because I pointed out that they were very comfortable palling around with white supremacists, lol. These people truly don't have any idea what real censorship is. If you wanna separate the art from the artist and listen to bands with fascists in them, I won't stop you.

Some random metal site saying "we're not going to cover bands associated with fascists anymore" isn't censorship. deathmetal.org is right there if you want a metal site that actively supports fascists in the scene, I guess.

Author:  AxeCapitol [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Bingewolf wrote:
Fingolfin76 wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…


Being that you are witnessing the rise of fascism in Italy right now, it seems odd to me that you wouldn't take more seriously the normalization of extreme ideas. Think of it like this, a kid grows up on the internet listening to black metal... they just keep finding more and more extreme stuff and find their way to the nsbm world. Not only are they being exposed to NS ideology, but they're in a corner of the internet that chest puffs and thinks that these ideas are a sign of masculinity and power. They find an identity in that - they also find a "brotherhood" amongst the other nazis.

HeavenDuff wrote:
That's not fair to pickles, bro. Comparing them to neo-nazis...


It's so much more obvious to pick mayo for the comparison... fat, white, gross, always trying to overpower everything else in the burger.... :lol:


I find your description of mayo more offensive than actual Nazis.

Not really - but you made your point well!!

Author:  Empyreal [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

LycanthropeMoon wrote:
Suddenly I'm reminded of when someone on this very forum accused me of trying to cancel Moonsorrow because I pointed out that they were very comfortable palling around with white supremacists, lol. These people truly don't have any idea what real censorship is. If you wanna separate the art from the artist and listen to bands with fascists in them, I won't stop you.

Some random metal site saying "we're not going to cover bands associated with fascists anymore" isn't censorship. deathmetal.org is right there if you want a metal site that actively supports fascists in the scene, I guess.


Almost all the dialogue about "cancelling" artists is just so polluted with garbage and nonsense really.

Author:  ThePoop [ Mon Jan 10, 2022 9:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Wahn_nhaW wrote:
And it's a rare day when I fully agree with something BastardHead says. This is that rare day.

lmao, seconded...
Quote:
So, here’s the why to this specific approach to a policy. Promoting, and thus potentially financially supporting, Neo-Nazi and Nazi-adjacent metal musicians and/or labels risks lending material support to a movement that has been shown [paywalled] to acquire material support not only from direct financial donations, but from the associated culture (such as white power music, festivals, and so on). It is my conviction, as an expert in the study of social movements and with a fairly solid grounding in radicalization, that the real danger posed by supporting Nazi metal is funding white power/Neo-Nazi mobilization, which can and does result in violence aimed at minorities and LGBTQ persons. On a societal level, therefore, material support can indirectly put real people at danger of physical harm and death, without getting into the political ramifications of it all. As such, I will not tolerate the promotion of, defense of, or apologies for Neo-Nazi and Nazi-adjacent bands on AngryMetalGuy.com. This, therefore, is not a discussion about “separating art from the artist.” This is not a discussion about enforcing some kind of ideological purity. This policy recognizes that fascist and Neo-Nazi movements pose an existential threat to people as a fundamental aspect of its ideology. It follows, therefore, that the chance of denying them financial support is worth denying coverage to bands or labels who ideologically promote or are involved in Neo-Nazism, white supremacy, or fascism (or associated organizations). Additionally, not covering these bands is an important signal that we support a community where minorities and LGBTQ persons should feel welcome.

If you agree with this I would think it follows that you would have to be against the inclusion of far-right/nazi bands on the archives. The fact is that MA-hosted reviews, label links and similar artist tabs are one of the best sources of discovery for prospective listeners and promotion for underground metal artists on the internet.

Just posing the thought - To clarify my personal opinion, I think if MA were to exclude these bands as policy it would obviously run contrary to the mission of the site and its place as a neutral archivist. Buuut, I do think you'd have to draw a hardline against this site if you agree wholesale with the above from amg. Idk...

Author:  HighwayCorsair [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 1:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

ThePoop wrote:
Wahn_nhaW wrote:
And it's a rare day when I fully agree with something BastardHead says. This is that rare day.

lmao, seconded...
Quote:
So, here’s the why to this specific approach to a policy. Promoting, and thus potentially financially supporting, Neo-Nazi and Nazi-adjacent metal musicians and/or labels risks lending material support to a movement that has been shown [paywalled] to acquire material support not only from direct financial donations, but from the associated culture (such as white power music, festivals, and so on). It is my conviction, as an expert in the study of social movements and with a fairly solid grounding in radicalization, that the real danger posed by supporting Nazi metal is funding white power/Neo-Nazi mobilization, which can and does result in violence aimed at minorities and LGBTQ persons. On a societal level, therefore, material support can indirectly put real people at danger of physical harm and death, without getting into the political ramifications of it all. As such, I will not tolerate the promotion of, defense of, or apologies for Neo-Nazi and Nazi-adjacent bands on AngryMetalGuy.com. This, therefore, is not a discussion about “separating art from the artist.” This is not a discussion about enforcing some kind of ideological purity. This policy recognizes that fascist and Neo-Nazi movements pose an existential threat to people as a fundamental aspect of its ideology. It follows, therefore, that the chance of denying them financial support is worth denying coverage to bands or labels who ideologically promote or are involved in Neo-Nazism, white supremacy, or fascism (or associated organizations). Additionally, not covering these bands is an important signal that we support a community where minorities and LGBTQ persons should feel welcome.

If you agree with this I would think it follows that you would have to be against the inclusion of far-right/nazi bands on the archives. The fact is that MA-hosted reviews, label links and similar artist tabs are one of the best sources of discovery for prospective listeners and promotion for underground metal artists on the internet.

Just posing the thought - To clarify my personal opinion, I think if MA were to exclude these bands as policy it would obviously run contrary to the mission of the site and its place as a neutral archivist. Buuut, I do think you'd have to draw a hardline against this site if you agree wholesale with the above from amg. Idk...


This ignores the reality that having a centralized place to archive the history of these guys holds them accountable. Many nazis try and get their music removed from the MA because it gets them in hot water, and guys who play in NS bands or run NS labels can be seen constantly reporting their own pages desperately trying to hide their actions.

Author:  ~Guest 280883 [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 4:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

I love how, every time something like this happens, i.e., someone takes a hard anti-nazi stand, a bunch of folks (pun intended) have a shitfit over it, accompanied by some variation of "but is this really that important?", thereby inadvertently showing that, yes, it really is that important. The very existence of the massive number of creeps for whom "nazism is not the real problem" proves just how real the problem is.

I've always loved AMG, and, contrary to some of the opinions expressed here, their reviews have always been of very high quality. This and Grymm's recent polemic against the persistent homophobia in certain corners of the metal world make me love them even more.

Author:  ~Guest 280883 [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 4:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

ThePoop wrote:
Quote:
So, here’s the why to this specific approach to a policy. Promoting, and thus potentially financially supporting, Neo-Nazi and Nazi-adjacent metal musicians and/or labels risks lending material support to a movement that has been shown [paywalled] to acquire material support not only from direct financial donations, but from the associated culture (such as white power music, festivals, and so on). It is my conviction, as an expert in the study of social movements and with a fairly solid grounding in radicalization, that the real danger posed by supporting Nazi metal is funding white power/Neo-Nazi mobilization, which can and does result in violence aimed at minorities and LGBTQ persons. On a societal level, therefore, material support can indirectly put real people at danger of physical harm and death, without getting into the political ramifications of it all. As such, I will not tolerate the promotion of, defense of, or apologies for Neo-Nazi and Nazi-adjacent bands on AngryMetalGuy.com. This, therefore, is not a discussion about “separating art from the artist.” This is not a discussion about enforcing some kind of ideological purity. This policy recognizes that fascist and Neo-Nazi movements pose an existential threat to people as a fundamental aspect of its ideology. It follows, therefore, that the chance of denying them financial support is worth denying coverage to bands or labels who ideologically promote or are involved in Neo-Nazism, white supremacy, or fascism (or associated organizations). Additionally, not covering these bands is an important signal that we support a community where minorities and LGBTQ persons should feel welcome.

If you agree with this I would think it follows that you would have to be against the inclusion of far-right/nazi bands on the archives. The fact is that MA-hosted reviews, label links and similar artist tabs are one of the best sources of discovery for prospective listeners and promotion for underground metal artists on the internet.

Just posing the thought - To clarify my personal opinion, I think if MA were to exclude these bands as policy it would obviously run contrary to the mission of the site and its place as a neutral archivist. Buuut, I do think you'd have to draw a hardline against this site if you agree wholesale with the above from amg. Idk...


Not at all. MA aims to catalog pretty much everything that meets the criteria. AMG is not an archive site, but first and foremost a review site. MA is an encyclopaedia that happens to allow user reviews. Different criteria apply. Review sites can choose not to cover whatever they don't want to.

Author:  ~Guest 1423526 [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 6:47 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Bingewolf wrote:
Fingolfin76 wrote:
Empyreal wrote:
It's definitely a major failure of education globally that nobody seems to know what "censorship" really is anymore.

My god another prof in the class

I never fear to listen Bilskirnir or Totenburg I fear of Meloni and Salvini genius…

Generalizing is wrong you don’t know me so please forget it…


Being that you are witnessing the rise of fascism in Italy right now, it seems odd to me that you wouldn't take more seriously the normalization of extreme ideas. Think of it like this, a kid grows up on the internet listening to black metal... they just keep finding more and more extreme stuff and find their way to the nsbm world. Not only are they being exposed to NS ideology, but they're in a corner of the internet that chest puffs and thinks that these ideas are a sign of masculinity and power. They find an identity in that - they also find a "brotherhood" amongst the other nazis.


I don’t believe that 99 per cent of folks that listen nazi bands care about they wrote..

Maybe if the school or family works we didn’t have that problem

Like a band is satanist is always banned as joke or don’t serious if Satanic Warmaster wrote a song 30 years ago about Hitler is a problem for our culture…

Music is a form of art if you ban music you must ban everything make a message of violence period.

Ps

For the genius

censorship, the changing or the suppression or prohibition of speech or writing that is deemed subversive of the common good. It occurs in all manifestations of authority to some degree, but in modern times it has been of special importance in its relation to government and the rule of law.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Author:  ThePoop [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:19 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

HighwayCorsair wrote:
This ignores the reality that having a centralized place to archive the history of these guys holds them accountable. Many nazis try and get their music removed from the MA because it gets them in hot water, and guys who play in NS bands or run NS labels can be seen constantly reporting their own pages desperately trying to hide their actions.

I don’t see how hosting positive user reviews, linking directly to labels and distros for purchase, advertising exactly where to stream the music and providing pipelines to do the same for similar bands is holding them accountable.

Wahn_nhaW wrote:
MA aims to catalog pretty much everything that meets the criteria. AMG is not an archive site, but first and foremost a review site. MA is an encyclopaedia that happens to allow user reviews. Different criteria apply. Review sites can choose not to cover whatever they don't want to.

I agree 100% - though I think you missed my point entirely and perhaps HighwayCorsair did as well. Intent and purpose does not equal impact. AMG said in so many words that hosting a review of nazi bands on their site leads to real world material support for nazis and therefore indirectly leads to physical harm and potential death for people. If that’s true, I’d imagine MA has a far greater potential to promote and therefore lead to real world material support for nazis than a review on amg for the reasons I described above. Whether ones an encyclopedia and the other is a review site is kind of irrelevant.

Author:  CrippledLucifer [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 7:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

ThePoop wrote:
HighwayCorsair wrote:
This ignores the reality that having a centralized place to archive the history of these guys holds them accountable. Many nazis try and get their music removed from the MA because it gets them in hot water, and guys who play in NS bands or run NS labels can be seen constantly reporting their own pages desperately trying to hide their actions.

I don’t see how hosting positive user reviews, linking directly to labels and distros for purchase, advertising exactly where to stream the music and providing pipelines to do the same for similar bands is holding them accountable.

I guess that some of those people have a musician profile that links the stuff they've been releasing under their Aryan Werewolf alias to their real life name, surname and photography. I can imagine how in some cases this may be counterproductive if they want to land a job and HR keeps stumbling upon their M-A profile after doing a Google search.

Author:  ~Guest 280883 [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

ThePoop wrote:
Wahn_nhaW wrote:
MA aims to catalog pretty much everything that meets the criteria. AMG is not an archive site, but first and foremost a review site. MA is an encyclopaedia that happens to allow user reviews. Different criteria apply. Review sites can choose not to cover whatever they don't want to.

I agree 100% - though I think you missed my point entirely and perhaps HighwayCorsair did as well. Intent and purpose does not equal impact. AMG said in so many words that hosting a review of nazi bands on their site leads to real world material support for nazis and therefore indirectly leads to physical harm and potential death for people. If that’s true, I’d imagine MA has a far greater potential to promote and therefore lead to real world material support for nazis than a review on amg for the reasons I described above. Whether ones an encyclopedia and the other is a review site is kind of irrelevant.


Thanks for clarifying. This is a complex issue, but ultimately, I think it's a matter of practicality and, that being so, the difference between the natures of MA and AMG is anything but irrelevant.

AMG has the capacity to do what they intend to, because they're a community of reviewers that, in theory, are in constant communication with each other.

The mods on MA, on the other hand, can only do so much to control the content of the reviews through modding, and the sheer number of the users here necessarily makes things more complicated and chaotic in that regard. It is, unfortunately, possible to write a glowing review of an album by a band known to support fascist and/or nazi causes without breaking the rules here. Such a review, even not mentioning the politics, ultimately promotes the band's politics. I get all that.

The thing is, I don't think this makes AMG's efforts futile. A lot of the arguments here seem to be along the lines of "this is not going to change anything". It's going to change as much as AMG has the power to change these things. That's better than nothing. I also think some people here underestimate AMG's reach, popularity and influence, but even if AMG were a whole insignificant review site, the action they're taking would be meaningful in and of itself. As it stands, they are a fairly prominent review website and it will have some impact. You can tell by the fact that "the other side" is already pretty upset.

The fact that other archives/review sites can't or won't make the same adjustments is not a good argument against AMG doing so.

Author:  Curious_dead [ Tue Jan 11, 2022 10:02 am ]
Post subject:  Re: AMG takes on Nazis

Nicencold wrote:
There are few things more insufferable than leftists who use technicalities to enforce censorship.


Like rightists who don't know the meaning of words.

Nicencold wrote:
All this handwringing is so lame. If you have a problem with something don't pursue it. If you feel the need to prevent others from making that choice you're doing freedom wrong.


Who is preventing anyone from making any choice? We're criticizing them for some choices. If you want to get a swastika tattoo, I'm not going to tackle you to the ground and yell the SJW police to take you to reeducation camps. But if you do, prepared to be called a fucking fascist because freedom is a two-way street. Likewise, if you have a platform and that platform is supporting Nazi bands, I have the fucking freedom to not support your platform and tell you why. I personally have no problem if you listen to Inquisition or whatever, if that's your thing. But I also have the freedom to tell you why you shouldn't support such bands. Again, two-way street.

Nicencold wrote:
Just don't cover what you don't want to cover. If they feel the need to make a huge statement about it then it's more about them then their cause. Casual condemnation is lame as well. I wonder how many of these people do virtue backgound checks for more than just the art they consume. Like are you sure the guy who fixed your toilet doesn't like Inquisition?


That's just a bunch of fucking bull shit. Why they don't cover a particular band is certainly relevant information. Just because it hurts your fragile feelings doesn't change the matter.

PS: I'm pretty sure I listen to some bands who have ideologies I disapprove of, or whose members are assholes, racists, etc. People draw the line at different places, doesn't seem to have occrred to you.

Again, I don't fucking care if the plumber likes Inquisition. I'm not even going to start a convo about it. But if Dagon came to my house in person to fix my toilet, or someone wearing a swastika or other fascist parephernalia, they'd get the fucking boot. Because that's a different situation. I know your type has trouble with nuances, but I hope this is an example even you can understand.

Also, don't fucking act as if only the left does shit like that. The right is ten times worse. All those imbeciles burning their Nike shoes because Nike supported Kaepernick? Or those idiots who thrashed their camping gear because the company stopped selling guns after a massacre? Those evangelsits burning Harry Potter books? Those concerned moms harrassing school officials because the school library has a book about a topic that triggers them (LGBTQ, race relationship...). Or those sites denouncing "radical" teachers, i.e. those who DARE say that Black lives do matter, or hell, in Texas or some other State ruled by morons, Republiturds are trying to pass a law that would make it ILLEGAL to say "Nazis are bad". Like fuck. All you're doing is prove once again right wingers are absolutely incapable of self reflection, and are projecting on a fucking IMAX screen.

Page 2 of 5 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/