|
To add to what BastardHead said above, the other major sticking points for other similarly-minded sites tend to be related to timing, level of commitment, and (I think) an interest in cataloging the subject matter.
There's nothing that can be done about timing. Part of MA's success has a lot to do with when it started; back in 2002 the Internet was still just starting to grow in popularity and there wasn't really anything comparable to MA out there. If you were new to the Internet, and trying to look up metal bands it's likely that you would have found this place as one of your first hits, determined that it had some value, and realized that it was missing information that you could add. Nowadays, if you were to look up a metal band, you will find this place but you will probably also find many other websites with information. That's definitely true for pretty much any band of any genre now; we live in a period of time in the history of the Internet where there is information overload and hundreds of sites now repeat the same information. Any new site like MA would have to compete with all of that, including social media, too. And, I think it was easier to build a community back then when these types of sites were more novel. I'm not sure if that's the case anymore.
Then there's the question of commitment. MA is what it is because of the users who have and continue to contribute to it. In 17 years (damn time flies...) we've basically gone from a handful of users, mainly pulled from other communities, to a website that now has around 550,000 users of which (reportedly) almost 400,000 are active. In that time, too, the site has had 90 staff members (130 if you include the "knight" rank) and many hundreds if not thousands of what I would call "power users" (essentially the folks that have spent the most time updating the site on a daily basis). The reason MA is able to survive and grow is because of this support network of people that contribute to it -- and that took time. Any new site like MA would have to start at the beginning, and it may take many years - maybe 17 - to reach the level that MA is currently at. Add on the struggle that such a site would face in attracting contributors and setting itself apart from general competitors like Discogs and Wikipedia... it will be a challenge.
This also lends itself into the other, and last, sticking point. I think others have mentioned this in threads about this before, and admittedly it's anecdotal, but I would agree that metalheads are probably a little unique among music lovers in how they view their music. It's true for other genres too - especially, I'd say, classical music and niche styles of music - but we have a fascination with trying to catalog and compartmentalize our music. I don't know the reasons why. Maybe it's because a lot of us are nerds. It could be that we just love to collect things. Who knows... but on the whole, I would argue a site like MA feels natural for most people who are fans of metal music. It's possible the success of this site is tied deeply to this. Now, whether that's true for fans of other genres I'm not entirely certain. Would fans of punk be as driven to work on a site like this? Fans of rap? Fans of rock? No idea. Metalheads without question, however, seem to be.
None of what I said should discourage anyone from trying to create non-metal sites like MA, but these are challenges I suspect are the reason why it doesn't tend to be very successful nowadays.
_________________ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
R.I.P. Diamhea 1987-2018 Live young, die free. Gone, but not forgotten.
|