Only a dictator can define when a discussion is over or not. You can just avoid to reply - not demand to stop. That's democracy. Anyway, I do not wish to cast acid on open wounds, this my last reply to you. because you have opened issues that can not stay unanswered. This way, people can read both sides and make their conclusions.
It is obvious that all three "Macedonias" are provinces of other countries. I will not refer to the cultural background of Macedonia, as far as the language, ethics, arts and philosophy is concerned (every educated person knows Aristoteles and Democritus), because it is obvious who is a closer descendant to them. I will refer to the use of the term Macedonia and the policies of the use of it. You characterized me to be an nationalist. Would you call nationalists the French government (Charles de Gaulle) when they demanded (1974) that "Great Britain" should enter the former EEC (today's European Union) by the name "United Kingdom" and NOT Great Britain, because of the French province of Britain, despite the fact that everyone calls them Great Britain? The assosiation is TOO obvious.
I have to inform you that both Hellas and FYROM accept the term FYROM, not only the hellenic side. This is what I revoke - where is the nationalists view in that, or do you mean sth else with the term nationalist?
Are you more neutral when you tell me that you are not obliged to conform with the "greek aspect" - because this indicates that you accept the other side! I have not obliged you to take someones side, but to use the official, neutral name, that both countries have agreed till now.
I have alreadyvisited the proposed links, but I have already studied history direcly from the authentic source, which involves all the history saved in the original tongue from the old time, till now. My language has helped me so far.
You have written that it is nationalistic the right of Hellas to monopolise the term Macedonia. I have already proved that this is not true (FYROM contains the term). But let me give you another example: would you accept Slovakians to use for their country officially the term "Czech Republic" after Czechoslovakia's split up? Would you then be a nationalist, if you reacted? (the term "czech" refers to you...) Imagine, we even accept the use of the term (FYROM).
I have nothing to add. I have nothing against you, Slavs, French, Chinese, English... I know who is who, and above all, who I am. My first remark refers only to the typic and the official use of some terms. There is some reason why this subject has risen so much talk.

Dictator? Damn straight. This is a private site, it isn't a democracy.

Now piss off already.