Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
https://forum.metal-archives.com/

Review passages: The good, the bad, and the what the christ
https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29824
Page 29 of 42

Author:  Acrobat [ Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

At least he mentioned that Ross the Boss is great, I'll give him that. But that's like saying oxygen is useful, you know? Oh, can you see what he did with the "epic fail" bits? Oh, it's cuz it's an epic album! Oh, haha! Honestly, why can't people apologise for their bad puns like me?

Author:  hells_unicorn [ Thu Mar 12, 2009 9:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

ANationalAcrobat wrote:
At least he mentioned that Ross the Boss is great, I'll give him that. But that's like saying oxygen is useful, you know? Oh, can you see what he did with the "epic fail" bits? Oh, it's cuz it's an epic album! Oh, haha! Honestly, why can't people apologise for their bad puns like me?


It looks like Flamos either pulled that review off because he realized he'd written a complete turd burglar or another mod found it and nuked it forthwith. Either way, the gods of metal are smiling once again.

Author:  PriestofSadWings [ Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

ANationalAcrobat wrote:
At least he mentioned that Ross the Boss is great, I'll give him that. But that's like saying oxygen is useful, you know? Oh, can you see what he did with the "epic fail" bits? Oh, it's cuz it's an epic album! Oh, haha! Honestly, why can't people apologise for their bad puns like me?


Especially considering that I made that joke first with my Wizard review. I had a lot of fun writing that one.

PriestofSadWings wrote:
The lyrics are all about subjects such as how badass Sven is, how bad Sven’s ass is, how big his army of metal demons is, how his accent can slay dragons, how his accent can slay posers, et cetera. There’s a line between fun cheesy lyrics and embarrassing cheesy lyrics, and apparently someone told the guys from Wizard that there were naked Valkyries on the latter side.


Anyway, one thing that made me raise my eyebrows was the opening sentence of Noktorn's review for Cannibal Corpse - Butchered At Birth.
Noktorn wrote:
Any so-called death metal fan who claims to dislike this album should be ostracized and ignored.

On the contrary, any album that has Chris Barnes' vocals on it should be ostracized and ignored.

Author:  Abominatrix [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:42 am ]
Post subject: 

hells_unicorn wrote:
saintinhell wrote:
hells_unicorn wrote:

I tend to discover albums I don't like at random intervals, as I think I've only reviewed 20 albums based on free mp3 promos and I tend to shop very carefully for Cds that I actually like.

Having said all of this, I've put up about 20 reviews in the past few months for obscure releases, including one for an unsigned Slovenian thrash band just after doing the Giddy Up Gangsta review, but the problem is nobody talks about these reviews.


Hmm...it's difficult to say which reviews get attention, usually somebody who's interested in that album or likes it would have to read it before it disappears into the archives. Actually why am I saying all that, you know it better than I do! :lol: Personally, I don't really look out for good words when I write a review, if it's something I want to say and it's not been said before, not all of it at least, I will just go ahead and post the review anyway. But then I go on long 'vacations' between reviews :P so I can only speak for myself. I suppose if you draw motivation from praise for your reviews, then it can get frustrating if nobody talks about it and then you feel like doing something that might get some attention. The problem is, not all attention is good attention either. :lol:


Well I don't intentionally seek attention for my reviews beyond what is considered normal on here, but it gets a little frustrating when people complain that I don't review obscure stuff when the only reviews they've read by me are my unobscure reviews and I'm renouned here for being a big time virgin album cherry popper during review challenges. If people genuinely don't like my deathcore reviews, I'm cool with that, but saying that I only review popular albums is an obvious falsehood that a quick perusing of the titles on my review archives will demonstrate.

Quote:
I never knew about that. So, thanks for the extra hating H_U fodder, I guess.


I was basically joking when I said it, it was on the ovenfodder thread when that big debate was going on about your Slough Feg review (which I actually defended). I do get a little bit annoyed with some of the reviews your fellow members in that group put up with regards to Ensiferum and a few others, but I'm well over the concept of ripping on you guys anymore. I'm only an occasional follower of Folk Metal and don't necessarily consider it my absolute bread and butter.

Quote:
I see the logic in that, but I wonder if you've fully thought through the implications. If we refused to write reviews for genres that mostly have childish, poorly writen reviews writen for them, then how in the fuck can we be writing reviews of Metal?

I'm just saying, sometimes it's worth a few minutes of composed Metalhead effort to point out everything that is wrong with nonsense like deathcore/mallcore/etc on the off-chance that some kiddie may read it and walk away even a fraction of an IQ point smarter.


No I agree with you on this. The thing is that I usually spend more time loving the hell out of Power, Thrash and Doom metal and am surprised that everyone is taking notice now that I've decided to sample some of deathcore's offerings. Maybe my reviewing patterns have become so routine that people think that I'm selling out or something by occasionally bashing something not regularly in my repertoire.


As for me, I've been enjoying many of your recent reviews of black metal albums.. Like saintinhell, I don't take the rating much into account and it seems to me that these offer a fairly fresh perspective, at a guess because many of these albums, deemed classics but generally only hailed by black metall enthusiasts, are new to you. This isn't meant to suggest that you're a "newby" to black metal (I really haven't a clue how long you've been listening to this type of music) but reading what you have to say about Darkthrone, Enslaved, Beherit et al reminds me of how I first felt when I started acclimatising to the style in the late 90s.

Author:  Wet Pussy [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:48 am ]
Post subject: 

PriestofSadWings wrote:
Anyway, one thing that made me raise my eyebrows was the opening sentence of Noktorn's review for Cannibal Corpse - Butchered At Birth.
Noktorn wrote:
Any so-called death metal fan who claims to dislike this album should be ostracized and ignored.

On the contrary, any album that has Chris Barnes' vocals on it should be ostracized and ignored.


Barnes is one of the best vocalists of all time. His vocals on Butchered are ear-fucking material. Tomb of the Mutilated has some incredibly guttural vocals too, but the production ruins it. Listen to the bonus tracks though (The Excorcist and Zero to hero), the guitar tone feels "wider" and as a result the vocals actually feel guttural and just simply awesome. Not pig squeel gutturalness either, but actual deep low growls that sound like Barney Greenway's vocals pitchshifted a hundred levels down.

Author:  BastardHead [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wet Pussy wrote:
PriestofSadWings wrote:
Anyway, one thing that made me raise my eyebrows was the opening sentence of Noktorn's review for Cannibal Corpse - Butchered At Birth.
Noktorn wrote:
Any so-called death metal fan who claims to dislike this album should be ostracized and ignored.

On the contrary, any album that has Chris Barnes' vocals on it should be ostracized and ignored.


Barnes is one of the best vocalists of all time. His vocals on Butchered are ear-fucking material. Tomb of the Mutilated has some incredibly guttural vocals too, but the production ruins it. Listen to the bonus tracks though (The Excorcist and Zero to hero), the guitar tone feels "wider" and as a result the vocals actually feel guttural and just simply awesome. Not pig squeel gutturalness either, but actual deep low growls that sound like Barney Greenway's vocals pitchshifted a hundred levels down.


No, Barnes is a god awful vocalist, but BaB is doubtlessly an extremely important album in the development of death metal.

Author:  Wet Pussy [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:33 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well, I guess I'm the only Barnes fan around these parts :(

Author:  hells_unicorn [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

Abominatrix wrote:

As for me, I've been enjoying many of your recent reviews of black metal albums.. Like saintinhell, I don't take the rating much into account and it seems to me that these offer a fairly fresh perspective, at a guess because many of these albums, deemed classics but generally only hailed by black metall enthusiasts, are new to you. This isn't meant to suggest that you're a "newby" to black metal (I really haven't a clue how long you've been listening to this type of music) but reading what you have to say about Darkthrone, Enslaved, Beherit et al reminds me of how I first felt when I started acclimatising to the style in the late 90s.


I'd sampled the style a few times going as far back as 1998, my first two experiences were "Deathcrush" and "Pure Fucking Armaggedon", both of which I absolutely hated at the time and I'd still basically put them both in the mid 60s to low 70s despite their obvious historical significance. I tried again in late 2006 with Darkthrone's "Transylvanian Hunger" and was really lukewarm about it. Later on I heard "Panzerfaust", which I liked a bit more. The album that really sort of won me over was "De Mysteriis Dom Sathanas", mostly because of Attila's vocal aesthetics. Afterwards I heard the "Freezing Moon" single with Dead, which I regard as Mayhem's crowning achievement and that sort of opened the door for everything else I've listened to. I would say I took the absolute plunge into the style after hearing Gorgoroth and Emperor, which was not long after I put up my review for "Transylvanian Hunger", which I recently amended to account for my change in taste.

This really only accounts for my experience with the 2nd wave and doesn't include my awareness of Bathory and early Sodom going back to around 1997, so you could kind of say I'm a new fan of the 2nd wave, since in the past 2 years my attitude towards this music has made a fairly dramatic shift. Suffice to say, if I'd heard Gorgoroth, Emperor, or Enslaved before I'd heard Mayhem, I probably would have had an easier time getting into the genre, as I've always been a fairly big fan of Symphonic and Thrash Metal.

Quote:
Well, I guess I'm the only Barnes fan around these parts.


Cannibal Corpse's two best albums had him on them as far as I'm concerned, granted, he was also on their two worst albums. I've always associated him more with CC than Corpsegrinder, even though I've grown to like later CC a bit better than I used to.

Author:  saintinhell [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

Wet Pussy wrote:
Well, I guess I'm the only Barnes fan around these parts :(


No, you are not alone. :P I am not a "fan" as such and Corpsegrinder is a better vocalist than Barnes, but eh, give me Corpse with Barnes, I think they simply made some of their best music at that time and while Barnes may not be the definitive death metal vocalist in my book, I have no complaints with his style at all and it adds to the appeal of the early Corpse albums.

Author:  Wet Pussy [ Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:55 pm ]
Post subject: 

saintinhell wrote:
Wet Pussy wrote:
Well, I guess I'm the only Barnes fan around these parts :(


No, you are not alone. :P I am not a "fan" as such and Corpsegrinder is a better vocalist than Barnes, but eh, give me Corpse with Barnes, I think they simply made some of their best music at that time and while Barnes may not be the definitive death metal vocalist in my book, I have no complaints with his style at all and it adds to the appeal of the early Corpse albums.


I like Corpsegrinder on Monstrosity's Imperial Doom but his work with Cannibal Corpse never appealed to me, vocally or musically (except the last three albums, Kill is growing on me :eek:) but I can't understand how anyone can like his vocal performance on those three albums, especially Evisceration Plague. Also, is it just me, or does he have more of a 'toughguy' voice in Cannibal Corpse (as compared to his vocals on Imperial Doom)

Eh, the defining point of early CC has always been their slower grooves and Barnes' vocals. That's just me, though.

Author:  saintinhell [ Sat Mar 14, 2009 1:55 am ]
Post subject: 

Wet Pussy wrote:

I like Corpsegrinder on Monstrosity's Imperial Doom but his work with Cannibal Corpse never appealed to me, vocally or musically (except the last three albums, Kill is growing on me :eek:) but I can't understand how anyone can like his vocal performance on those three albums, especially Evisceration Plague. Also, is it just me, or does he have more of a 'toughguy' voice in Cannibal Corpse (as compared to his vocals on Imperial Doom)

Eh, the defining point of early CC has always been their slower grooves and Barnes' vocals. That's just me, though.


Agreed, I also dig Corpsegrinder much more with Monstrosity.

Author:  ~Guest 126069 [ Sun Mar 15, 2009 8:24 pm ]
Post subject: 

UltraBoris on the Cro-Mags wrote:
This, however, isn't the happy ultraliberal idealism of the Dead Kennedys - here, the truth is flat-out: "world peace can't be done!".


:scratch:

DK wrote some of the most cynical lyrics I've ever read.

Author:  morbert [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 7:56 am ]
Post subject: 

ThrashingMad wrote:
UltraBoris on the Cro-Mags wrote:
This, however, isn't the happy ultraliberal idealism of the Dead Kennedys - here, the truth is flat-out: "world peace can't be done!".


:scratch:

DK wrote some of the most cynical lyrics I've ever read.


Do you think UB ever really listened to DK ? Of course he didn't.... apart from some covers by metal bands like Sep, ND and Laaz....

Author:  Acrobat [ Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:36 am ]
Post subject: 

Maybe he thought 'Holiday in Cambodia' was actually about having a really nice time in Cambodia - like some sort of package holiday? Hey, it wouldn't be the first time I've seen grossly idiotic "All that punk shit belongs on Mars!" opinions on MA.

Author:  Noktorn [ Wed Mar 18, 2009 10:11 pm ]
Post subject: 

Lordian Guard - Lordian Guard

Quote:
However, Tsamis’ ego seems to rule, with negative results to this album. He tries to do everything. Why? What does he want to prove? He’s an excellent composer, good lyricist and capable guitarist. So, why to play bass and keyboards too? Does he think that he’s god? I’m sure that if he could sing and play drums as well he would do it also there, creating the first metal band with... only one member! Unfortunately, although he’s not tragic as a keyboard player, he is not exceptional too. He’s only well-desciplined.


what the fuck

Author:  BastardHead [ Thu Mar 19, 2009 1:05 am ]
Post subject: 

Haha, that's been brought up before. What a clueless idiot (he's most likely quite new to metal, judging by that one snippet).

Author:  Acrobat [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

I found this sentence strangely arousing:

flyingspaghettimonster wrote:
If you imagine a three-way between early Manilla Road, Dianno-era Iron Maiden, and Cirith Ungol with some Motorhead thrown in you'll get a bit of an idea.


No umlaut on Motörhead, for shame...

Author:  failsafeman [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 2:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

ANationalAcrobat wrote:
I found this sentence strangely arousing:

flyingspaghettimonster wrote:
If you imagine a three-way between early Manilla Road, Dianno-era Iron Maiden, and Cirith Ungol with some Motorhead thrown in you'll get a bit of an idea.


No umlaut on Motörhead, for shame...

I couldn't stand the eyes looking at me.

Also, I find it pretty funny that Abom's review for Into Battle does not at all reflect his current opinion on the album...he's a total BH fanboy now. :lol:

Author:  Acrobat [ Sat Mar 21, 2009 7:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

'You know me, evil eye'...

I should really investigate Brocas Helm some more, especially considering that I've been hankering for some medieval sounding metal for quite some time now.

Author:  caspian [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:10 am ]
Post subject: 

Metaljerk on Forest Silence's Philosophy of Winter wrote:
This album is all about winter. Summer ain’t got shit on winter, bitch. Winter’s got frostbitten motherfuckers all up in your PIECE. Winter’s the fucking bomb. Winter’s ice cold, motherfucker. You don’t fuck with winter. The guy who made this, you know his name? That’s right, motherfucker. Winter.


:scratch:

Author:  failsafeman [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 1:58 pm ]
Post subject: 

caspian wrote:
Written by and for the comatose. - 35%

Wait, I thought my title suggestion was "too obvious"? :p

Author:  caspian [ Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

failsafeman wrote:
caspian wrote:
Written by and for the comatose. - 35%

Wait, I thought my title suggestion was "too obvious"? :p


Sometimes, obvious is good :P :P

Author:  Abominatrix [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

failsafeman wrote:
ANationalAcrobat wrote:
I found this sentence strangely arousing:

flyingspaghettimonster wrote:
If you imagine a three-way between early Manilla Road, Dianno-era Iron Maiden, and Cirith Ungol with some Motorhead thrown in you'll get a bit of an idea.


No umlaut on Motörhead, for shame...

I couldn't stand the eyes looking at me.

Also, I find it pretty funny that Abom's review for Into Battle does not at all reflect his current opinion on the album...he's a total BH fanboy now. :lol:


You're right; I was pointing that out in the other thread before I came over here. :lol:

Another old one that doesn't quite reflect my views anymore is my review for Manilla Road's "Out of the Abyss". That one dates back to 2002, when I was just discovering the band.

Author:  BastardHead [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 7:15 pm ]
Post subject: 

failsafeman wrote:
...he's a total BH fanboy now. :lol:


I just saw that part and my ego swelled up to the size of the moon. :D

Author:  failsafeman [ Mon Mar 23, 2009 8:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Abominatrix wrote:
Another old one that doesn't quite reflect my views anymore is my review for Manilla Road's "Out of the Abyss". That one dates back to 2002, when I was just discovering the band.

Yeah, it's total proof just how much time it takes to get into those bands...in both reviews you say "this isn't really my favorite band" or "this isn't really a classic"...and now MR is your favorite band and you love BH, haha. I'm sure I would've written similar things about the bands back when I first got into them.

Author:  caspian [ Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:20 am ]
Post subject: 

oh dear oh dear oh dear. Some idiot on Woods of Ypres's shitty Allure/Pursuit thing:

Quote:
While reading the reviews that proceed this one, you may find that the reviews are not too high. The fact is this album is an essential piece of innovative blackened doom metal. The childish snarls at this album by the elitists that frequent this site are coming from the kids walking around your local mall with their reprinted Darkthrone shirts and who will argue almost to tears that Nachtmystium is underground. This is a mature piece of music reeking of raw emotion and modern experience.


:durr:

Author:  hells_unicorn [ Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:22 pm ]
Post subject: 

caspian wrote:
oh dear oh dear oh dear. Some idiot on Woods of Ypres's shitty Allure/Pursuit thing:

Quote:
While reading the reviews that proceed this one, you may find that the reviews are not too high. The fact is this album is an essential piece of innovative blackened doom metal. The childish snarls at this album by the elitists that frequent this site are coming from the kids walking around your local mall with their reprinted Darkthrone shirts and who will argue almost to tears that Nachtmystium is underground. This is a mature piece of music reeking of raw emotion and modern experience.


:durr:


:lol:

Even ignoring the obvious idiocy in referring to other reviews on the site (an unprofessional practice that I stopped engaging in about 3 years ago), this is just retarded. In my entire mall/flea market going days fishing the local bargain bins for treasure, I've yet to see a single person walking around with a Darkthrone shirt. Maybe things are different in Canada and Europe, but I've yet to see any hipster kids or wannabe true metal kids wearing one.

Author:  failsafeman [ Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

caspian wrote:
oh dear oh dear oh dear. Some idiot on Woods of Ypres's shitty Allure/Pursuit thing:

Quote:
While reading the reviews that proceed this one, you may find that the reviews are not too high. The fact is this album is an essential piece of innovative blackened doom metal. The childish snarls at this album by the elitists that frequent this site are coming from the kids walking around your local mall with their reprinted Darkthrone shirts and who will argue almost to tears that Nachtmystium is underground. This is a mature piece of music reeking of raw emotion and modern experience.


:durr:

Oh man, you should've said that's on another website, you had me frantically looking around for it here for a nuke...unless someone else got to it first!

Author:  EntilZha [ Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think it's the latter.

Author:  hellhippie [ Tue Mar 24, 2009 5:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

^^^^^i never read a review for an album that I am planning on writing a review for , in fact I wait until my review gets accepted and then usaually give it a week or two . I find this keeps my words my own(not that i would use someone else's) and sometimes on the heavily reviewed albums it gets a bit strange seeing all these people express similar thoughts and opinions about the album I just wrote about .

Author:  zeingard [ Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:32 pm ]
Post subject: 

hellhippie wrote:
i never read a review for an album that I am planning on writing a review for , in fact I wait until my review gets accepted and then usaually give it a week or two .


It's always good to get a gauge on the general opinion of an album, plus it prevents repetition. Explicitly mentioning other reviews is poor form and makes your review reek of desperation to defend/bash a particular album.

Author:  Ribos [ Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:25 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
How does the album sound? Imagine putting Poison, Whitesnake, and Winger in a room. The ceiling opens up, and urine rains down upon them. As the fruits in question are trying to save their perms, the ceiling opens again and gasoline pours down. Now really vexed and wondering when they can get a salon appointment, none of the band members notice that slits have opened up in the walls, and the nozzles of flame-throwers are poking out. Next thing you know, Yngwie’s standing in a pile of ashes and melted jewellery bending his axe strings all over the place with an orgasmic expression on his face.

From demonomania's review of Yngwie's "Seventh Sign"

Honestly, that whole review had me laughing and makes me want to listen to the album. It's very difficult to deny THIS kind of rating:
Quote:
8 sitars accompanied by triangles and tiny organs out of 10.

(I have no idea what that's even supposed to mean, but I like it.)

Author:  failsafeman [ Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:50 pm ]
Post subject: 

Ribos wrote:
Honestly, that whole review had me laughing and makes me want to listen to the album. It's very difficult to deny THIS kind of rating:
Quote:
8 sitars accompanied by triangles and tiny organs out of 10.

(I have no idea what that's even supposed to mean, but I like it.)

He rates it 8 out of 10, instead of stars he uses funny instruments that are played on the album for rating units. Not really hard to understand.

Author:  Acrobat [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:45 am ]
Post subject: 

The more I read it, the more it becomes the BEST REVIEW EVER! No, seriously, what the hell is a tiny organ? Sounds like something you'd be ashamed to show a woman.

I think it's very important to read the other reviews for anything you're considering reviewing. This is especially the case when it comes to releases with a lot of reviews, you wouldn't want to reiterating other peoples' ideas. Also, putting things in context of what others have said isn't always a bad thing.

Author:  hells_unicorn [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 12:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

ANationalAcrobat wrote:
The more I read it, the more it becomes the BEST REVIEW EVER! No, seriously, what the hell is a tiny organ? Sounds like something you'd be ashamed to show a woman.

I think it's very important to read the other reviews for anything you're considering reviewing. This is especially the case when it comes to releases with a lot of reviews, you wouldn't want to reiterating other peoples' ideas. Also, putting things in context of what others have said isn't always a bad thing.


It's a pretty damn funny review, though the hyperbole isn't that far off, considering it's basically the best album that Yngwie put out in the 90s and the stuff found on there is among the heavier stuff that he's done in his career. Mike Terrana's drumming really puts some serious balls on the arrangement as well, if you haven't heard that album, I highly recommend it.

I mostly tend to read the reviews of others also and try not to mention any one specific point of view already touched, but sometimes I'll refer to a general sentiment about an album that I've read on several other reviews, not just here but on other sites as well. I like to research what I'm reviewing a bit also, just to give a little background on albums that hasn't been touched upon. I don't mention the Metal Archives by name in my reviews anymore, because 95% of my reviews also end up on The Metal Observer site.

Author:  hellhippie [ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

ANationalAcrobat wrote:
The more I read it, the more it becomes the BEST REVIEW EVER! No, seriously, what the hell is a tiny organ? Sounds like something you'd be ashamed to show a woman.

I think it's very important to read the other reviews for anything you're considering reviewing. This is especially the case when it comes to releases with a lot of reviews, you wouldn't want to reiterating other peoples' ideas. Also, putting things in context of what others have said isn't always a bad thing.


I would have to disagree , I find reading other's opinion about an album tends to get in the way of how you really feel about the music . Not that I or anyone else would be using the same words but if it happens it happens . the review is then left solely on the basis (at least for me ) of your true opinion . Most things I review I like, or love, or worship for that matter and while i do read other reviews about stuff I enjoy generally I just quickly pass through the review scores to see how someone rates a release instead of reading their words about it until my opinion has truly been written . not that anyone else's way of writing is taken from other's words it's just how I see it .

Author:  saintinhell [ Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:29 am ]
Post subject: 

hellhippie wrote:

I would have to disagree , I find reading other's opinion about an album tends to get in the way of how you really feel about the music .


Then perhaps your mind is too fickle? :P I read the previous reviews to know whether I have anything to add or is there a new perspective about the album I hadn't thought of, it doesn't change the way I feel about the album...most of the time!

Author:  Evil_Johnny_666 [ Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

I usually don't care if someone dislikes, hates or would buy dozens of cds of an artist I like just to burn them while laughing maniacally, but Malacoda, besides giving 20 to Obscura's Cosmogenesis (http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=223077#189527), says it utterly sucks in a... more than questionable way. It's not just a part that is bad but the whole short review, I wonder if he even listened to the album. And there is almost no musical description. Just read the review and you'll understand.

A couple of highlights: "Cosmogenesis is not a metal release [...] ... and standard metal drums. [...] there is a growling vocalist [...] do not have the necessary characteristic of death growls - anger!" or "Obscura sound like a band that has nothing better to do than play mediocre technical death metal, which they are not trying especially hard to play." (that must mean it REALLY sucks.)

Hell not so much death metal vocalists sound angry... surely not Necrophagist! and they supposedly are raw too. and more coherent in songwriting. He says the band doesn't work, does unmemorable shred... And he gave Xenosapien 90. He contradicts and contradicts himself. I mean like I said I couldn't care less if someones hates anything I like but come on, he could say "OMG the new absu suck, it's no tara pt. 2, Proscriptor is so sold out" or some other sentence of the type that I can make me understand why someone doesn't like it, instead I can't understand at all. Well it made me laugh.

Author:  MaDTransilvanian [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 8:41 pm ]
Post subject: 

Evil_Johnny_666 wrote:
I usually don't care if someone dislikes, hates or would buy dozens of cds of an artist I like just to burn them while laughing maniacally, but Malacoda, besides giving 20 to Obscura's Cosmogenesis (http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=223077#189527), says it utterly sucks in a... more than questionable way. It's not just a part that is bad but the whole short review, I wonder if he even listened to the album. And there is almost no musical description. Just read the review and you'll understand.

A couple of highlights: "Cosmogenesis is not a metal release [...] ... and standard metal drums. [...] there is a growling vocalist [...] do not have the necessary characteristic of death growls - anger!" or "Obscura sound like a band that has nothing better to do than play mediocre technical death metal, which they are not trying especially hard to play." (that must mean it REALLY sucks.)

Hell not so much death metal vocalists sound angry... surely not Necrophagist! and they supposedly are raw too. and more coherent in songwriting. He says the band doesn't work, does unmemorable shred... And he gave Xenosapien 90. He contradicts and contradicts himself. I mean like I said I couldn't care less if someones hates anything I like but come on, he could say "OMG the new absu suck, it's no tara pt. 2, Proscriptor is so sold out" or some other sentence of the type that I can make me understand why someone doesn't like it, instead I can't understand at all. Well it made me laugh.


I went on and read that review and I must say, it's not exactly incredible. Indeed the guy doesn't really sound like he knows anything about what he just reviewed and his basic argument of ''it's not metal because I don't like it'' utterly fails. It's almost as useless as the ''it's gay because I don't like it'' argument which is used almost as often around here. At least he can write a grammatically coherent sentence. It's just too bad none of those sentences have any useful content.

Author:  User16533 [ Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

The new review that Leify wrote for Korn's debut = classic!

Page 29 of 42 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/