| Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives https://forum.metal-archives.com/ |
|
| Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please) https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4153 |
Page 89 of 239 |
| Author: | ogmetal [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
No nuke worthy items? C'mon...this homework is driving me nuts and I feel like deleting something to unleash all this RAGE! ARRRRGGGHHH1!!!11 |
|
| Author: | Empyreal [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1416#2174 Have at it, my good man. |
|
| Author: | ogmetal [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Empyreal wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1416#2174
Have at it, my good man. Great album, ATROCIOUS review. Nuked. That's the stuff. |
|
| Author: | Witcher [ Tue Dec 18, 2007 7:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Reports (about 5 during the last two days) for Slave Whipping Blasphemy by user Drone December 18th, 2007 Posted at 08:07 Soturnus review..... "Here you have a ridiculously programmed drum machine that only blasts at lightspeed in 90% of the time. " The band page clearly states there are drums and a drummer. This review is biased, doesn't give an accurate or well description of what the album is, it's pointless. It gives nothing to the reader. -------------------------------------------------------- For the last time, as review will not get deleted just because it is negative or biased, it is the musiocal description what matters. I will leave the judgement over its quality to Nightgaunt, since I would vote for keeping it just to piss the whiney fanboy off. |
|
| Author: | Thorgrim_Honkronte [ Tue Dec 18, 2007 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Weren't you advocating for the deletion of requiem's reviews for factual inaccuracy, though? It's the same here. |
|
| Author: | saintinhell [ Tue Dec 18, 2007 1:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I love Haunting The Chapel, but even then, this cannot pass. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=210#111766 Blatant fanboy raving, hardly describes anything about the actual music except references to the tempo and then the English is really poor in patches. Individually not totally horrible on each count, but in totality doesn't read nicely: |
|
| Author: | Witcher [ Tue Dec 18, 2007 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thorgrim_Honkronte wrote: Weren't you advocating for the deletion of requiem's reviews for factual inaccuracy, though? It's the same here.
You seem to leave out (for whichever reason), that I have asked him repeatedly to correct the questioned part of the review and got only insults in response. The user should have an opportunity to correct the mistake, if there is any. I have learned to not trust all statemens of black metal musicians blindly, especially on their music, releases etc. |
|
| Author: | Nightgaunt [ Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The Slayer review mentioned above was deleted. About the other band, it is often the case that members in BM will be credited as drummers not only when they perform the role on a proper kit or live-digitally, but also when they simply handle drum programming. Hence, MA's members info is not sufficient proof to show that the drums are not, in fact, programmed. However, it is still a possibility. As such, the piece will stay for now (since the reports Witcher has mentioned clearly have as their intention the removal of a review that the reporter finds offensive, on basis of a mere technicality), until someone who has listened to the band can here confirm whether the drums are live or not--it is usually exceedingly easy to tell. If the reviewer is, in fact, mistaken, he can be contacted and given the chance to alter/correct the contested sentence. |
|
| Author: | MushroomStamp [ Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nightgaunt wrote: As such, the piece will stay for now (since the reports Witcher has mentioned clearly have as their intention the removal of a review that the reporter finds offensive, on basis of a mere technicality), until someone who has listened to the band can here confirm whether the drums are live or not--it is usually exceedingly easy to tell. If the reviewer is, in fact, mistaken, he can be contacted and given the chance to alter/correct the contested sentence. http://www.myspace.com/slavewhippingblasphemyfan This is a pretty obvious drum machine: there is no dynamic variation in the samples, there's a hyperspeed blasbeat in the first song that 99.97% of the world's drummers couldn't play, and the cymbals sound like they were taken directly from a cheap Casio. And the hi-hat, Jesus Christ! ;__; edit: Quote: Sir Reginald - Plantation Owner
Seamus DeVille -Guitar/Bass/Vocals/Programming |
|
| Author: | Thorgrim_Honkronte [ Wed Dec 19, 2007 1:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Witcher wrote: Thorgrim_Honkronte wrote: Weren't you advocating for the deletion of requiem's reviews for factual inaccuracy, though? It's the same here. You seem to leave out (for whichever reason), that I have asked him repeatedly to correct the questioned part of the review and got only insults in response. The user should have an opportunity to correct the mistake, if there is any. I have learned to not trust all statemens of black metal musicians blindly, especially on their music, releases etc. I didn't leave it out for any purpose, I just thought it wasn't important. If something isn't factually correct in a review, then it is invalidated, and they should change it or it should be removed. |
|
| Author: | Reaper43 [ Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=64066 Three reviews, the top one is fine the second is a useless track by track and the third and thus first review written for the album is utterly pathetic and should be removed now that other reviews exist for the album. |
|
| Author: | ~Guest 76452 [ Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Fozzy is taken care of. |
|
| Author: | Reaper43 [ Wed Dec 19, 2007 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks Perdition. Damn that was fast. |
|
| Author: | Nightgaunt [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Obliged, MushroomStamp. The review in question will stay. |
|
| Author: | matras [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 3:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
After reading this review, I have no idea what the record sounds like. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 5770#21175 |
|
| Author: | saintinhell [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The rating and review also seem at odds with each other. |
|
| Author: | Gutterscream [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
matras wrote: After reading this review, I have no idea what the record sounds like.
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 5770#21175 It's not all-encompassing obviously, but travels along Deadlove's usual to-the-point and ultimately 3 point style. Decently played black metal with falsetto vocals that, according to him, comes on Black Legion-ish during the 'chant' parts. Sure, he could've done more, like actually mentioning those 'new elements' he donates one fleeting sentence to, but hey. His reviews alway cling to the fence with me, but I get his gist. Plus it's a lone review (with no special treatment due to the current nu-review antics). At least he's not using the same website title anymore. |
|
| Author: | pinpals [ Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=726#123138 The English is very poor and there are parts that make me grimace, especially in the third paragraph. |
|
| Author: | Gutterscream [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 9:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
pinpals wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=726#123138
The English is very poor and there are parts that make me grimace, especially in the third paragraph. I have to agree with you there despite the fact that I'm the one who accepted it. Here's the third: Now about the songs: you get songs from every album but the ones from SWR and COD have absolutely no power because the distortion is too doomy instead of deathly. Evidently James Murphy left his trace in COD. On the other hands if the first 2 albums were the killer ones why closing the pit with Final Thoughts and then Slowly we rot when I would pick up Find the Arise and Slowly we Rot but we get Platonic Disease, Back from the Dead which is absolutely boring, Final Thoughts which is too slow to put before the killer mid tempo SWR. |
|
| Author: | Napero [ Fri Dec 21, 2007 7:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I just nuked the reviews (2003 vintage) on Incestuous's Brass Knuckle Abortion by Violent_Offender and Thrasher666. They were bad. Just announcing here, move along, move along! Nothing to see here... |
|
| Author: | Empyreal [ Mon Dec 24, 2007 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 9687#85493 Bad formatting, and the guy doesn't really elaborate on why everything sucks so much about this record. Several typos. |
|
| Author: | Caerb [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 5:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/userrevie ... e=HawkMoon I would suggest taking a look at all of his reviews - most of them seem to be from 2002, which would probably explain a thing or two. The following are particulary bad. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1882#170 http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1883#170 http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=4083#170 |
|
| Author: | Napero [ Tue Dec 25, 2007 6:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Judgement has been passed on everything up to this post. It's easy to play the role of the foward observer when the target is someone like HawkMoon, standing on an open field with every review from 2002 and eyes closed. Still, let's not overdo it, I left the Divine:Decay review for now. That does not mean it's very good, of course, but let's wait for a new review before it meets Mr Axe. |
|
| Author: | DrOctavia [ Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=19088 The review second from the top sucks. I found all of two lines of musical description in the midst of that poorly formatted, whiny mess. Also, mentioning an element of the music (the vocals) and then simply neglecting to comment on them at all is not a good idea, especially for a review so lacking in actual content. A couple of the others on that page seem none too fresh, either. |
|
| Author: | Witcher [ Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/board/vie ... hp?t=33504 Opinion of more mods on the Horde review by Kalelfromkrypton??? |
|
| Author: | Aeturnus65 [ Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It may not be worth the fuss wondering about a Snxke review, but after buying all the Grave Digger remasters and perusing some reviews his writeup of 'Excalibur' REALLY doesn't mesh with the score - a "horribly pointless and laughable record" a 75%? Plus, the intro is filled with some illogical hatred of all things German. And regardless of how good one believes the album, I'm not sure I've ever seen anyone else refer to mid-late era GD as fodder for 'flower metal kids'. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1476#267 |
|
| Author: | Nightgaunt [ Fri Jan 04, 2008 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think that the score in the contested Snxke piece is not really so out of step with what he says in the review, taken as a whole. He is trying to reconcile what he feels to be an objective assessment of the quality of the performance itself (meaning things like sound quality, instrumental proficiency, etc.) with one of those sneering comments about "relevance" that one most often sees from incredibly sophisticated and worldly people. The line you've quoted is in regards to this latter factor; lines like "This CD is well played, impeccably produced and all the cheese-fantasy aspects are there" relate to the former. Considering the tone as it relates to the overall message, I'll grant you that a somewhat lower numerical score might be a bit more appropriate than the one currently assigned, but in this case I don't think this is enough to render the thing nukeworthy. |
|
| Author: | Forbinator [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This is the definition of redundance: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 168#133552 Quote: Gorgoroth - Review - 90%
Written by Pratl1971 on January 4th, 2008 I am more than a casual fan of the Norwegian/Swedish black metal scene and I'm quite familiar with Gorgoroth from the early days. The new CD, Ad Majorem Sathanas Gloriam, is a lesson in evil straight out of the Scandinavian "black book". Originally spawned in 1992 from Norway, Gorgoroth has seen many lineup changes as well its fair share of legal troubles which should lend no credence to the music – as that stands the music is pure "kult" black metal that is completely raw, unpolished (yet with decent production) and blasphemous – all three elements of proper songs for Satan! The band currently consists of founder/guitarist Infernus (still holding helm since the band's inception), King ov Hell handling bass (though he has just left the band by mutual agreement for "ideological concerns), growling and vocal offerings are spewed from the throat of Gaahl. The drums were done by none other than Frost, who needs no introduction in black metal circles (though for those less versed, he is from Satyricon). From beginning to end this offering is 31-minutes of blasphemy at its best! The CD has terrific moments of typical black metal insanity in tracks like "Wound Open" and "Carving a Giant", and total guitar-heavy slowness of "God Seed" that do not diminish the reputation Gorgoroth has carved for itself in the last 14-years. "Sign of an Open Eye" is simply brutal and horrifying. If true black metal is what you seek, then Gorgoroth will fill your wants nicely with Ad Majorem! Isn't it great to wait three years for a new CD from a great band and have it live up to all hopes and expectations? Gorgoroth has let up not one hair in its service to the Dark Lord and it shows! As of this writing Gorgoroth has entered the Norwegian charts at 22 with Ad Majorem, while King has officially left the band by mutual agreement for "ideological concerns", hence carving another notch in the band's ever-changing roster. However, it makes me very happy to see a black metal band reaching any type of chart entry, especially in Norway where the shadow of Varg Vikernes, church fires and murders still loom ominously. Ihsahn did it earlier this year with "The Adversary" and now Gorgoroth has followed suit, exposing more people to the wonder and beauty that can be, and is, black metal! Give this CD a spot in the blackest part of your collection. (Originally presented in Metal Coven webzine 8-12-06) Most of this review is just pointless background information that can be found on the band/album pages, and the only description of the music is in the second paragraph, where he uses a few throw-away adjectives to describe songs. |
|
| Author: | DeathForBlitzkrieg [ Mon Jan 07, 2008 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Deep Purple's In Rock http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3385#181 Quote: The roots of NWOBHM - 100%
Written by David on August 21st, 2002 Today Deep Purple is understood as a hardrockband, but when In Rock was released this was where Heavy Metal started. O.K. Black Sabbath have become the inventors of heavy metal, with their heaviness and their riffs. But Deep Purple's album In Rock has the other elements of heavy metal: The wildness, the rawness, the virtuosity, which are also important in heavy metal, which Black Sabbath didn't have. The highlights: Speed King has it's roots in rock n'roll and starts with noise, becomes silent with a melody played by organ and continues with the main riff and Ian Gillian's raw vocals. Child in time is their masterpiece, starts as a half-ballad which changes in Ian Gillian's wild screams and then Richie Blackmore's legendary guitar solo, which has become one of the best guitar solo in hardrock/metal history. Here Ian Gillian shows why he is called one of the best hardrock-singers and Richie Blackmore shows his virtuosity compared with lot of feeling. Flight of the rat is maybe their most underrated song. I starts with a (typical) heavy metal riff and has a catchy melody. Black Night was originally released as a single, and quickly recorded after the label wanted to know where the single is. So they went into studio, jammed, wrote and recorded this song in a very short time! Amazing, this has become their most famous hit after smoke on the water. It is now available on the remastered edition of In Rock. Also great is the bonus track Cry Free. I wonder why this was took out of the album. The song disappeared until 1977, when the Powerhouse compilation was released with rare tracks. The Compilation itself became also rare, so the track is avaiable on this new version the first time on CD. The other bonus track is instrumental, Jam Stew, which shows again their virtuosity. Also included is the first version of Speed King, which is with piano and less guitars and was released on single. Were the first 3 albums more 60's pop/rock and the classical intermezzo called Concerto for band and orchestra the Jon-Lord-album, this was the Richie-Blackmore-album where he shows his skills which have later become the influences of heavy metal. There are different original versions of this album. Some have the track black night, some edited the intro of speed king off, etc.. I have a original german version, where the sky is white instead blue. This album was not only a landmark, it laied the foundation of heavy metal! |
|
| Author: | HateAndPlague [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=69#134154 Quote: I managed to get a blowjob at 14 because of this. - 82%
Written by Sigillum_Dei_Ameth on January 9th, 2008 *WARNING* The following review contains endless name-dropping, trips down memory lane, bragging rights and tales of teenage lust. You have been warned. Cradle of Filth.....boy there's a name that stires up so much fucking controversy these days in the Metal universe. The one band that brought BM to the mainstream. Is this a curse or a blessing from the horned one? One can think how they completely took Black metal, pre-packaged it to bovine American tweens in hopes of marketing and making it profitable through gimmicks and a false state of elation of being "evil"....BUT....then again one could look at it as one of the gateway bands for those in their early teen years who with a strong inititive and imagination, descend down the left hand path with dedication and an iron fist......but unfortunately many who take this path don't necessary continue to walk the firey footsteps. They fall wayside and stagnate within their own minds and hearts never to show humility and to let the fire burn away their impurities only to step out on the otherside stronger, more determined, and more enlightened of what darkness really is. Now why I go on a whole discussion of such beliefs is what attracted me to Black Metal in the first place. In the mid to late 90's, CoF along with the slew of others where just merely "obstacles" before I learned of even more dedicated bands such as Archgoat, Beherit, Krieg, Von, Sarcofago, etc. It might seem rather silly of me to look back on how I got there, but then again that's part of the whole adventure. Back to CoF.....even before they were nowhere NEAR the commercial success of what they are today, I honestly thought they were laughable and hokey at first. I picked up "Dusk & Her Embrace" at the local Spec's Music and thought it was intresting but lacked something that I could find within other bands such as Slayer, Celtic Frost, Sodom, King Diamond, Mercyful fate....the works. A year or so later they release "Cruelty & The Beast" which I firmly believe that it's their ONLY album worth owning/listening to/praise-worthy/shelling out money for. Dani Filth for some reason doesn't sound so annoying on this as much as on other albums with him on it. Guitarists Stuart and Gian do an excellent job combinging various Gothenburg melodies with Slayer-esque Thrash metal speed. Nicholas Barker down for his triggered double-bass has the typical double-bass typewriter effect. Lecter manages to break this monotany with the over-the-top Sisters Of Mercy keyboards adding the English Goth atmosphere. Chubby siren Sarah Jezebel Deva lets loose her excellent vocal chords providing the voice of Elizebeth Bathory complete with European coursets and cleavage(ever seen a pic of her? Yes she does have a nice rack)....with all of this said, this is NOT Black Metal. This is simply symphonic metal with extreme overtones played with Goth atmosphere. Think if Shakespeare's "Macbeth' had a modern-day soundtrack and you might come blose to it. Sounds such as "Cruelty Brought the Orchids", "Lustmord & Wargasm", "Desire In Violent Overture" provide the listener with rather good quality riffs where as "Venus In Fear" and "Portrait Of A Dead Countess' add the atmosphere of the story of the infamous Hungarian countess' descent into absolute madness. This might seem like one of the albums one might place in their Top 20 list, but alas it doesn't hold up that well. Well, after being a fan of this album and band for one summer, I ended up either losing this CD, by either giving it away or one of my friends "borrowed" it and never returned it. Didn't bother me really. In trade for losing a good CD, I actually managed to recieve a my first blowjob from a hot Goth chick at the age of 14. so it wasn't completely bad. All of this being said again, CoF had the potential of possibly carrying this streak of good music but everyone and their grandmother knew that wouldn't happen due to the revolving dor of band members, labels shifts, etc. Oh well, at least they had one decent album, too bad the decided to carry on. They should have ended here to save themselves from further embarrasment. Hey, at least I got a blowjob out of all of this. The bolded section is the part that actually talks about the music. Less than half the review is a poor description of the album's contents, and the rest is a bunch of rambling bullshit complete with typos and an excess of ..... dots. There are 12 other reviews for the album, good and bad. I don't think this is high enough in quality to merit being there. |
|
| Author: | caspian [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 6:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
HateAndPlague wrote: http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=69#134154
Quote: Epic CoF review The bolded section is the part that actually talks about the music. Less than half the review is a poor description of the album's contents, and the rest is a bunch of rambling bullshit complete with typos and an excess of ..... dots. There are 12 other reviews for the album, good and bad. I don't think this is high enough in quality to merit being there. I personally think it's a good review. Very readable and some brief but good music description. |
|
| Author: | doom_monkey [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=807#109455 what the hell was this guy thinking... no memorable songs???! Oh dear. And as for Enemy of God and Violent Revolution surpassing Pleasure to Kill....
|
|
| Author: | The_Saberfool [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 2:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
doom_monkey wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=807#109455
what the hell was this guy thinking... no memorable songs???! Oh dear. And as for Enemy of God and Violent Revolution surpassing Pleasure to Kill.... ![]() Looks like a good review to me. The fact that it offers a different opinion on a popular album is refreshing to see and he expresses his feelings on the album pretty well. |
|
| Author: | doom_monkey [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 3:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
i dunno, i guess its well written, but sometimes it seems to me like some people just have a beef against a particular album merely because its popular etc. oh well each to his own... still, i think 25% is insulting to PTK tho, but the majority seem to recognise its awesomeness so no biggie. |
|
| Author: | The_Saberfool [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 4:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
doom_monkey wrote: i dunno, i guess its well written, but sometimes it seems to me like some people just have a beef against a particular album merely because its popular etc. oh well each to his own... still, i think 25% is insulting to PTK tho, but the majority seem to recognise its awesomeness so no biggie.
I agree that PTK is a damn fine album, but as long as a negative review has some decent thought put into it and is fairly well written I see no reason to nuke it for deviating from the norm. We'll let the mods judge for themselves, I guess. |
|
| Author: | Witcher [ Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
doom_monkey wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=807#109455
what the hell was this guy thinking... no memorable songs???! Oh dear. And as for Enemy of God and Violent Revolution surpassing Pleasure to Kill.... ![]() I hope, that you DO understand, that the reviews are accepted based on which musical description the user offers, how coherent it is and if he uses, logical, followable reasonings for his deduction, NOT on the opinions presented in them or the musical taste?? Factual mistakes are also a prblem , but they are something else than an unpopular rating or opinions on the quality of music. As I said on the forum, I think Soldiers.. is the best Vicious Rumors album and overshadows even the acclaimed Digital Dictator by large. Would you try to silnce my legitimate opinion?? Something else is to state, that an album is a conceptual one, when it is not, include false info about the location of the band, wrong band members' names, wrong tracklisting, to confuse a cover song with a band's own material - that is a factual mistake. Not an opinion on music, presented in a comprehensive way, even if unpopular. |
|
| Author: | saintinhell [ Fri Jan 11, 2008 12:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Heh, I was actually going to recommend that PTK review..imo, the album is overrated, though by no means mediocre. But more importantly, he convincingly argued his opinion, that's all that matters. |
|
| Author: | caspian [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=60080#14274 Way too brief track by track, doesn't need to be there. |
|
| Author: | ~Guest 76452 [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 1:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
@ Caspian That review is killed. |
|
| Author: | saintinhell [ Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
So PTK review was deleted eh?? Kinda sad, I thought it was great that that album was finally getting some of the flak Darkness Descends and RIB seem to get these days , because it is in no way a more distinguished effort. Besides, I always thought the other four classic Kreator albums were better, though that's just me.
|
|
| Page 89 of 239 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|