Fuck, I missed the Left Hand Path review. What was it like?

I'd describe it as similar to the stuff by that sammyslamz guy, but slightly less obvious. By that, I mean he didn't mention the lack of breakdowns in every other sentence, he acutally used punctuation and capitalized correctly. Other than that, the content was the same: "this is an old grandpa's death metal, it was made 50 years ago" kind of stuff.
EDIT: Nevermind, link above.

Bringing up someone that the moderators have repeatedly declined to discipline for the same thing will not get you results.

Whose dick did he have to suck around here to get that crap he calls a review published?

It's well written and raises enough points to be accepted, get the fuck over it. Yes, it was obnoxious in places and he used his signature Tepes style, but honestly there wasn't much wrong with it. Just write your own review.

Well I guess this answers my previous question.
"Signature Tepes style," heh. What a load.

and suck ass whiny reactions like yours are the stuff he feeds off of.

Vlad Tepes is not just a troll, he actually makes genuine arguments. They may be often (usually) controversial if not inflammatory, but there's reasoning and sincerity behind them. The mods are not your mommy and will not scold Tepes for offending your oh-so-delicate sensibilities.

Enough. It's not going anywhere, go whine about it on whatever other message boards you post on. I'm sure there will be plenty of other people there to agree with you that we're all a bunch of big meanies.

There are a bunch of erroneous or strange characters in the text in OzzyApu's review of Xasthur's Nocturnal Poisoning. Makes it hard to read.

I'm gonna go ahead and nominate this character Tepes The Unweeping again, since it seems I was completely ignored last time.

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 697#127248

His reviews are childish, uninformative, have little to no substance, and are mostly just curse words and personal attacks against the band and the people who like them, rather than criticism of the actual music.

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=616#146192

Cryptwatcher's review. It's bad, adds nothing new to the pool and he also writes complete utter bullshit. Just read the review! He also states in his profile that he's 17 and 2 years into metal which is in contradiction to what he writes.

Nuke it.

Another Snxke review which can be deleted:

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=2091#267

Like most of the reviews by this user, this review is too short and tells me little to nothing about the music:

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 4315#74528

Like most of the reviews by this user, this review is too short and tells me little to nothing about the music:

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 4315#74528

It's the only review for that album, and while it's brief on description, there's still enough description for its inclusion. It will stay.

It's one thing to keep in mind. If it's the only review for that album, then the standards for its inclusion are less than those albums with many more reviews. It's better to have some description then nothing at all.

I know that, but I didn't know the standards were lowered that drastically.
But I suppose you're right, It's better to have little than nothing.

That review can indeed stay, I don't think we'll ever get another for the album, or even the band itself, for that matter.

Erick is currently somewhere in a School of Men, probably right now being yelled at by a mean drill sergeant with a huge vocabulary of profanities, or maybe he's crying himself to sleep in bunk on a ship. He joined the Navy and wants be become Rambo.