Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives
https://forum.metal-archives.com/

Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please)
https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4153
Page 144 of 239

Author:  MarkLikesMetal [ Sat Dec 05, 2009 1:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think this review for Bathory - Bathory needs nuked:
http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=754

Quote:
On a dark night, a terrible storm ravaged the land, bringing damnation for all those who weren’t protected in their houses. The terrifying wind had never been so strong. In that terrible night, Quorthon was born.

He grew on a small village on Scandinavia, living as a normal person. However, when he was 18, the ‘Reaper’ made himself present before him. Gruesome and distorted, he moved in an incredible speed. The beast then spoke to the young Quorthon with a horrid, scary voice, like no human had ever heard before: “Thou shall be the human salvation, thou shall bring my Lord damnation”. And so the creature tried to kill the young man.

In a desperate act, Quorthon begged for his life, and offered everything he could give. In the depths of the dreadful valleys of ‘Hades’, a place of darkness and evil where the damned were forced to march at unforgiving speed commanded by hellish demons with infernal voices, Satan heard his pleas.

The Reaper was ordered to stop, and Quorthon was brought before Lucifer. A deal was made, and Quorthon was then ‘In conspiracy with Satan’. With that deal, the young man would have to follow Satan’s orders, to kill, destroy and torture as fast as possible, with no mercy for those who crossed his way. He was immediately possessed with anger and wrath.

The mistake was done, and so the young man had to wander the forests and plains of Scandinavia, taking the life of those in his way. One day, Quorthon found a circle of men in a glade, practicing ‘Necromansy’. The ritual was filled with ruthless, sharp words, and a sense of brutality could be felt with each word pronounced.

They were intending to realize a bloody, shocking ‘Sacrifice’ of pure bestiality. And even though Quorthon had no mind of his own, he felt an urge to stop that ritual. But he wasn’t fast enough, for the necromancers said the words with remarkable speed. On that moment, a lightning fell from the sky, magically imploding the crying virgin.

The necromancers proceeded to a different ritual, this time with the intent to ‘Raise the Dead’. It was slower than the previous ritual, and Quorthon could hear church bells in the distance. The rain started to pour intensely. The atmosphere of the moment was heavy, pounding. And so the poor man attacked the necromancers.

It was a difficult battle, and he was nearly dying when a man with white hair and a single eye appeared, killing the enemies instantly. A sense of familiarity was felt by Quorthon. The tall, white haired man then introduced himself as Odin. He broke the bonds with Satan, and explained to the young warrior that he was chosen by him to fight on a great, upcoming “War”, that would be short but brutal and relentless, eventually leading to “Armageddon”. The end of the world, said Odin, would be the most insane moment in mankind’s history, and also the most unforgettable.

So Quorthon, now free from Satan’s command, decided to follow the path Odin had set for him, and try to stop the final battle from starting. This was just a prelude of things to come, he felt, and the greatest moments were still to come, but it was a great beginning, nevertheless.

To be continued…


...what the hell? o_O

Author:  Acrobat [ Sat Dec 05, 2009 3:39 pm ]
Post subject: 

:lol: Looks like something I might have written 2 years ago.

Author:  EntilZha [ Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:19 pm ]
Post subject: 

This review is perfectly informative. What more do you want from a review than telling you the songtitles?

Author:  lord_ghengis [ Sun Dec 06, 2009 1:20 am ]
Post subject: 

Haha, seriously though, who let that through.

Author:  BaloroftheEvilEye [ Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

I'd like to humbly ask why this wasn't rejected?

For Gardenian's Two Feet Stand:

"Suddenly I wanna re-enjoy Gardenian, to recall the day I met Swedish Metal. So Two feet stand was putted in, well, it's not bad and writting something 'bout this Album is essential.

I can talk shortly: music is near At the Gates, Arch Enemy ( and In Flames, of course ), if you like that bands, Gardenian'll be your good friends. Drums goad incredible in #1 and Freedom. The begining of #2 is a brand new beauty, and female vocals make this song become more and more proud. Gardenian's rarely crazy in playing their music but often turn Death Metal to Thrash, softer and sweeter. Still some hard-riffs there, as the sturdiness for all. Netherworld gives me a melodiously bourn in vastly forest. Then, Do me now carry on high speed, look ! the way they're playing guitars is the difference between Old School Death and Swedish Death. You can view this point again in #9. The silent fall lulls me, this song ended Two feet stand as it was one of best Instrumentals. All noises have gone, there's just hush now, and in my mind still this proposition: The voices in my head twist my mind ( Mindless Domination ).

Anyhow, Two feet stand is just one of good Swedish Metal Albums, rain! I hope you like it, if you were, tell me your drifts."

I think the poor guy did it in his own language then ran it through an online translator.

Author:  Napero [ Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:46 pm ]
Post subject: 

lord_ghengis wrote:
Haha, seriously though, who let that through.

This particular question is reserved for the admins and owners alone. Don't ever ask it again.

The review seems to be gone. Who was the author?

Author:  MercyfulSatyr [ Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

BaloroftheEvilEye wrote:
I'd like to humbly ask why this wasn't rejected?


For future reference, you're meant to give the mods a link. ;)

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1904#3943

Author:  BaloroftheEvilEye [ Tue Dec 08, 2009 1:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

Completely forgot, thanks, and my bad.

Author:  yentass [ Tue Dec 08, 2009 8:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=164939.

I'm quite uncertain if this review belongs on the encyclopaedia.

It's very short, and if you filter out the overdwelling on pointless idioms like "true elemental bone-crushing breakdown's along with cyber speed melodies" or "well understandable diabolic grunting" and the occasional hardcore-kid "breakdownz" worshipping, you end up with little information about the music itself.



(Plus he gave this pile of steaming crap a 100%, but that's completely irrelevant)

Author:  EntilZha [ Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:10 pm ]
Post subject: 

yentass wrote:
breakdown's

:ugh:

Author:  ogmetal [ Tue Dec 08, 2009 9:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

yentass wrote:
breakdown's



You shouldn't have gone and done that, pa.

Author:  Abominatrix [ Wed Dec 09, 2009 12:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

BaloroftheEvilEye wrote:
I'd like to humbly ask why this wasn't rejected?

For Gardenian's Two Feet Stand:

"Suddenly I wanna re-enjoy Gardenian, to recall the day I met Swedish Metal. So Two feet stand was putted in, well, it's not bad and writting something 'bout this Album is essential.

I can talk shortly: music is near At the Gates, Arch Enemy ( and In Flames, of course ), if you like that bands, Gardenian'll be your good friends. Drums goad incredible in #1 and Freedom. The begining of #2 is a brand new beauty, and female vocals make this song become more and more proud. Gardenian's rarely crazy in playing their music but often turn Death Metal to Thrash, softer and sweeter. Still some hard-riffs there, as the sturdiness for all. Netherworld gives me a melodiously bourn in vastly forest. Then, Do me now carry on high speed, look ! the way they're playing guitars is the difference between Old School Death and Swedish Death. You can view this point again in #9. The silent fall lulls me, this song ended Two feet stand as it was one of best Instrumentals. All noises have gone, there's just hush now, and in my mind still this proposition: The voices in my head twist my mind ( Mindless Domination ).

Anyhow, Two feet stand is just one of good Swedish Metal Albums, rain! I hope you like it, if you were, tell me your drifts."

I think the poor guy did it in his own language then ran it through an online translator.


It's Flora!! Some crazy vietnamese person I think. He/she used to have a few other reviews on the site and they were all in poorly constructed english with crazy and incomprehensible metaphors. I rather liked them. :lol:

Author:  yentass [ Wed Dec 09, 2009 3:17 pm ]
Post subject: 

ogmetal wrote:
yentass wrote:
breakdown's



You shouldn't have gone and done that, pa.


Heh I didn't really, I was mocking the childish enthusiasm upon breakdowns on this review, I could literally picture the guy just roaming around the room yelling "breakdownz, raaaahrrr!!1" while listening to the album, hence the Engrish.

Author:  yentass [ Wed Dec 09, 2009 3:26 pm ]
Post subject: 

Also, check the most recent one here:
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=16809

Think theres no need to elaborate, the review wasn't written by the author but merely reproduced with permission. Not exactly plagiarizm, but still not acceptable by the guidelines.

(I've also tagged that via "report a mistake" on the band page, but that happened before I've rediscovered the "Oven Fodder")

Author:  Ribos [ Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:39 am ]
Post subject: 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 7907#75307
Review date: November 5th, 2009
Album release date: January something, 2010.
Promo copies were made available November 13th and 14th at NWN fest in Berlin.

There's a bit of a discrepancy here, methinks. Advance copy or not (the band has a review for the album posted on their myspace from September), the rules are pretty clear about this.

Author:  Nightgaunt [ Thu Dec 10, 2009 3:50 am ]
Post subject: 

yentass wrote:
Also, check the most recent one here:
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=16809

Think theres no need to elaborate, the review wasn't written by the author but merely reproduced with permission. Not exactly plagiarizm, but still not acceptable by the guidelines.

(I've also tagged that via "report a mistake" on the band page, but that happened before I've rediscovered the "Oven Fodder")


You reported that earlier, for another band. You must know something I don't, because the review's alleged authorship is in line with the profile that is submitting it--that is, StoneMaiden's profile indicates that she is Talia Helene. The silly and unnecessary quasi-legalese at the end of her reviews isn't supposed to indicate that she's posting them on someone's behalf. It's just a writer's stamp, basically. A mark of propriety.

Author:  yentass [ Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:21 pm ]
Post subject: 

Nightgaunt wrote:

You reported that earlier, for another band. You must know something I don't, because the review's alleged authorship is in line with the profile that is submitting it--that is, StoneMaiden's profile indicates that she is Talia Helene. The silly and unnecessary quasi-legalese at the end of her reviews isn't supposed to indicate that she's posting them on someone's behalf. It's just a writer's stamp, basically. A mark of propriety.


My bad, then, apparently I've got the "reproduced by permission of the author" line wrong.

Author:  Pale_Pilgrim [ Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

BaloroftheEvilEye wrote:
Netherworld gives me a melodiously bourn in vastly forest. Then, Do me now carry on high speed, look !


:lol: I love this part. It just sounds great in my head, and utterly hilarious.

Author:  hakarl [ Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:29 am ]
Post subject: 

yentass wrote:
My bad, then, apparently I've got the "reproduced by permission of the author" line wrong.
It means that the review may be copied only with the permission of Talie herself.

Author:  Radagast [ Fri Dec 11, 2009 11:37 am ]
Post subject: 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=245719

This one isn't in need of deletion on grounds of quality, but it has been submitted against the wrong Order of Ennead album. The recording of the second album has only just been finished. :lol:

Author:  autothrall [ Fri Dec 11, 2009 12:40 pm ]
Post subject: 

Radagast wrote:
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=245719

This one isn't in need of deletion on grounds of quality, but it has been submitted against the wrong Order of Ennead album. The recording of the second album has only just been finished. :lol:


This is what happens when I drink and post.

Will re-submit to the proper place.

Thanks Radagast.

-auto

Author:  drengskap [ Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:35 am ]
Post subject:  Plagiarised review?

I found this review of Yggdrasil by Ashes:

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=151480

Then I found this review on the Aquarius records website:

http://www.aquariusrecords.org/cat/a30.html

(scroll down)

Apart from the opening paragraph, they are identical - so unless dark_materials, the 'author' of this review, works at Aquarius Records, I think this is a clear case of plagiarism.

Author:  Rild [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:29 pm ]
Post subject: 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=219904

Top review by RobAnybody for Cobalt's "Gin".

Lots of boring, egotistical blathering, and no music description beyond nebulous comparisons to other bands.

Author:  ThePipster [ Thu Dec 17, 2009 11:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

After reading that review I actually felt like listening to Tool...

Author:  Nightgaunt [ Fri Dec 18, 2009 3:04 am ]
Post subject: 

Good catch, drengskap.

Author:  oneyoudontknow [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 6:50 am ]
Post subject: 

really?
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1027#1678
Quote:
10 Years of Chaos and Confusion, and I am two years late. I would slap my own face, but at least I got here in time. Late – very late – but I am, definitely, and finally, here.
My first contact with Hypocrisy was in a car. I had to admit I had a certain prejudice – I don’t really know why, maybe because the human being can not understand properly the difference, or maybe because the name did not tell me much. In sum: pure narrow-mindedness. Okay. Huuum. That sounded good. That sounded REALLY good, what the hell was that? It was, indeed, Hypocrisy.
I think what made me more surprised about the band is that, despite the fact they are a death metal band, they sound so singular. Oh, yes, it’s always about the originality thing. They manage to sound really heavy, but still…atmospheric. Keyboards are allowed, at times; but they’re just in the exact volume to make you notice and distinguish them, but not to be bothered. I admire Peter Tägtgren for many reasons, but his great abilities as a producer is, undoubtedly, the most important one.
In this CD, you can clearly tell the difference between Masse Bromberg and Peter, which is also a plus. Of course, you could say that, being Penetralia Hypocrisy’s first album, it was rawer. Well, the songs were re-recorded. I can also add that I am not a huge fan of distorted bass lines, but in Hypocrisy they sound perfect.
This one is the kind of album you never get tired listening to. It deserves a perfect ten.

Author:  DevilsWhorehouse [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:23 am ]
Post subject: 

OzzyApu wrote:
I don't want to rage specifically on AIC's Dirt, but the first review on that page it horribly written.

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3959#902

It's got some decent-ness to it, but it's filled with gramatically errors, punctuation issues, lazy formatting, and more emphasis on calling out the drugs side of things rather than describing the music.



I just read this review and it repulsed me enough that I immediately registered an account for the expressed purpose of voicing my disgust.

MA can be a little more tolerant of such amateurishly written reviews for obscure black metal garage bands from the Ivory Coast but there's more than enough competently written reviews for an album like Dirt.

His scoring system alone makes it worthy of nukage. He subtracts 3 points for the presence of Iron Gland FFS...

Author:  Acrobat [ Sat Dec 19, 2009 10:13 pm ]
Post subject: 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=661#135223

colin040's the buzzwords! THE BUZZWORDS!

Author:  Imitation_Of_Life [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 1:42 am ]
Post subject: 

Personally, I think paranj's review needs nuked.

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 699#163065

There is false information in this review, most notably where he says that there are male vocals on the record -- there aren't. Alissa does all the vocals on the album.

Edit: And now that I look at it again, there are numerous grammatical errors and he mentions that guitars sound like buzzing, like in badly produced black metal album. That simply isn't true. The production on everything is extremely polished and well heard.

Author:  hakarl [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:44 am ]
Post subject: 

ANationalAcrobat wrote:
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=661#135223

colin040's the buzzwords! THE BUZZWORDS!
Holy crap that review is bad. :lol:

Author:  DevilsWhorehouse [ Sun Dec 20, 2009 9:02 pm ]
Post subject: 

Vader - The Beast

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=48946#15272

Quote:
The Beast, Indeed - 100%
Written by pulverized on September 27th, 2004

This album is another reason why Vader is one of my favorite bands. When I first heard Doc wouldn’t be pulling drum duty on this album, I was quite worried that it wouldn’t stack up against their past releases. Even at first I didn’t like the drum sound or playing at all, but after I listened to it a couple of times the drums really grew on me and I love the sound, Daray is an excellent drummer, at times I feel he surpasses Doc. Well, back to what this review is supposed to be about, the music. That’s it, the music.. the most important part about this album. Vader play in a more “melodic” way than on previous albums, incorporating many styles similar to Death, which is stripped down death metal. The solos are very different than older Vader, they are played with much more focus and beauty on this album. Don’t worry Vader-heads, Vader still kicks in the amazingly fast riffs and mind numbing drumming they are known for. The stand-out track is The Sea Came In At Last, very different for Vader, Peter uses a new type of clean vocal never heard in Vader before that works extremely well in helping creating the “atmospheric” feel to the song. All in all The Beast is a very complete album that should make any Vader fan happy.


Pretty worthless IMO.

Author:  DevilsWhorehouse [ Mon Dec 21, 2009 3:04 am ]
Post subject: 

Blasphemy - Gods of War

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3140#7008

Quote:
BLASPHEMOUS ATOMIC NUCLEAR WAR COMMAND - 100%
Written by ebick12588 on March 2nd, 2004

BLASPHEMY has given the metal world a hallmark to the very evil nature of underground metal with their final studio swan song: GODS OF WAR.

Furious, imposing riffs, although simplistic, demand attention. Bestial, impious vocals evoking imprecations and death against Christendom and her paltry followers blend harmoniously with the drums and bass, provoking a bout of frenzied neck snapping from the listener. Combining the best elements of Black, Death, Thrash, and a trace of Grind, BLASPHEMY pummels the listener with maleficent, necrosadistic metal. 12 years have passed since this release, and it never gets tiresome. You would have to be a fool, poser, or have no clue about underground metal not to rate this album as one of the most influential Black Metal/ War Metal releases of all times. A classic no serious metal head should be without.

As an added bonus, the album contains the cult demo, BLOOD UPON THE ALTAR (1989).

BLASPHEMY are responsible for originating what we now call War Metal, influencing bands like MYSTIFIER, BEHERIT, BESTIAL WARLUST, CONQUEROR, REVENGE, BLACK WITCHERY, GOAT PENIS, MORBOSIDAD, ANGEL CORPSE, ABOMINATOR, OBEISANCE, MANTICORE, and countless others.


I'm not certain this even qualifies as a review. It reads more like an ad in Terrorizer magazine.

Author:  Ribos [ Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:09 am ]
Post subject: 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 945#133043

Newest review for The Chasm's Farseeing... album. It starts off promising... and then it's over. He compares the band to Manilla Road in their similar progressive tendencies, and tells us only four of the eight songs have lyrics. In fact, he actually spends more effort describing how Manilla Road sounds than The Chasm, let alone on this album.

Author:  Empyreal [ Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:35 am ]
Post subject: 

Manilla Road might be similar to The Chasm in consistency, but otherwise they are nothing alike.

Author:  Darth_Roxor [ Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:03 pm ]
Post subject: 

http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=12977

I must say the review by Empyreal is hilariously bad. Not liking something due to bad performance is one thing, but hating it because you're not the target audience and whining 'BAAAAAW TIS NOT SAVATAGE AND IT'S BARELY METVLZ' when it's not even called Savatage or pretending to be anything metal is ridiculous.

It's as if I suddenly started reviewing black metal, which I genuinely don't like, and in the end said 'pffff, Dismember is so much better than this'.

Author:  Empyreal [ Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:31 pm ]
Post subject: 

Darth_Roxor wrote:
http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=12977

I must say the review by Empyreal is hilariously bad. Not liking something due to bad performance is one thing, but hating it because you're not the target audience and whining 'BAAAAAW TIS NOT SAVATAGE AND IT'S BARELY METVLZ' when it's not even called Savatage or pretending to be anything metal is ridiculous.

It's as if I suddenly started reviewing black metal, which I genuinely don't like, and in the end said 'pffff, Dismember is so much better than this'.


What target audience, people over the age of 80? I like plenty of stuff about as mellow as that. It just sucks. Also, it's easy to take any review and turn it into a stupid fistful of caps-lock mania and "whining" over text, isn't it?

Aside from that, I mention IN THE REVIEW that it probably wasn't supposed to be metal at all, so yeah, I know it's not supposed to be metal - review is clearly based on other facets, albeit its short length. Reading comprehension?

Author:  Darth_Roxor [ Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

Quote:
As if one horribly pompous and borderline-metal band wasn't enough


Quote:
I can say that this is definitely not a metal project, though, and Oliva had finally crossed the line here, creating an album so synth-laden and orchestrated that it was not anywhere near rock music at all


Quote:
There are good moments, but there are too many interludes and lame, boring songs for my liking


Quote:
The music itself is watered down prog rock crapola riddled with slow piano interludes, orchestrations, several different types of vocals, Christmas-y jingles, and everything else in between.


Yup, you sure sound like you like 'this kind of stuff'.

Guise, this is not metvl, gotta give it a low rating.

Quote:
from a band that hasn't produced anything of worth in about 15 years now. There comes a point where you just have to give up on a band, and I'd say this is it for Savatage.


You also don't sound completely biased and with an attitude of 'this will suck no matter what!!'. Savatage had a record of releasing 'bad albums' for 15 years, and suddenly, you thought a new band (which is even titled an ORCHESTRA), will release something with an 80's 'Tage sound... in a Christmas-themed album?!

Oh, and now that you mention caps-lock mania:

Quote:
"LOOK AT ME, I CAN WRITE EMOTIONAL AND INTELLIGENT MUSIC, AREN'T I GREAT?"


Quote:
Stick with Edge of Thorns for a better representation of this style.


'baaaaaaaw, tis not savatage'.

Not to mention that Edge of Thorns and TSO are two completely different things.

Quote:
review is clearly based on other facets


Really? All I could see there was 'this is not Savatage' and 'pompous, slow... AND ABOUT CHRISTMAS!!'. I'd also love to see all these hundred million billion interludes you're talking about, unless everything under 3 minutes is an interlude for you.

Author:  Empyreal [ Thu Dec 24, 2009 4:59 pm ]
Post subject: 

You are so far off the mark it's insane. You're quoting stuff out of context and fitting it to your own need to lambast the review for not agreeing with your own opinion - just admit it.

Author:  Darth_Roxor [ Thu Dec 24, 2009 5:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

Empyreal wrote:
You are so far off the mark it's insane. You're quoting stuff out of context and fitting it to your own need to lambast the review for not agreeing with your own opinion - just admit it.


What a splendid 'no u' answer.

Not agreeing with my own opinion? Perhaps, but that's beside the point. If you don't see how completely stupid it is to rate one band in relation to another, different one, then words fail me. As much as I can agree that TSO is basically an extension of the later Savatage, it's not Savatage and should not be judged as such.

What's next? Saying Karl Sanders' solo projects are banal shit boring slow ambient and not death metal?

Author:  yentass [ Thu Dec 24, 2009 8:16 pm ]
Post subject: 

Darth_Roxor wrote:

As much as I can agree that TSO is basically an extension of the later Savatage, it's not Savatage and should not be judged as such.


That's the only point you're right about.
The review is perfectly descriptive and basicaly everything but "NON METVLZ" whining like you present it. "Watered down prog rock crapola"
describes the musical style of the "crapola", and not saying "it's shit because it's prog rock"; same applies to your other quotes.

Page 144 of 239 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/