Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives

Message board

* FAQ    * Register   * Login 



Reply to topic
Author Message Previous topic | Next topic
caspian
Old Man Yells at Car Park

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:29 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:47 am 
 

I don't think so, really. Short and punchy reviews are where it's at. I think for the most part I'd take a 3 pointer to a masturbatory 8 point essay.
_________________
https://kybaliondoom.bandcamp.com/album/poisoned-ash big ugly death doom by and for big ugly dudes

https://strangercountry.bandcamp.com/al ... the-chebar new album! Power shoegaze? Dream-doom???

Top
 Profile  
EntilZha
Retired

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:22 pm
Posts: 2115
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:50 am 
 

Points aren't given for length. A good short review still gets five points.
_________________
Join my awesome last.fm groups: -1- / -2- / -3-

Top
 Profile  
caspian
Old Man Yells at Car Park

Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:29 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:54 am 
 

I dunno, have there ever been any short 8 pointers? I find it unlikely.
_________________
https://kybaliondoom.bandcamp.com/album/poisoned-ash big ugly death doom by and for big ugly dudes

https://strangercountry.bandcamp.com/al ... the-chebar new album! Power shoegaze? Dream-doom???

Top
 Profile  
Zorg85
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:02 am
Posts: 675
Location: Austria
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:38 am 
 

Not sure it's the best thread to post this but I found a partialy plagiarized review

Unless user Samael27 from Costa Rica is the same guy as PowerMetal59 from the Metal Crypt (which I doubt..) he copied one entire paragraph from this review

Seventh Wonder - Mercy Falls


http://www.metalcrypt.com/pages/review.php?revid=4408

Samael27's review:

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=202982

Plagiarism:

heavy guitar riffs, blistering solos, complex bass lines, perfectly layered keyboards, flawlessly executed time changes, stunning melodies and majestic, sweeping choruses, accompanied by beautiful short acoustic interludes and spoken narratives which allows for a smooth flow of the storyline.

----

Some sentences are also copied from this review

http://www.seaoftranquility.org/reviews ... nt&id=6902 (strange is that review dates from october 30 ...)

Also from there

http://www.seventhwonder.nu/album_revie ... falls.html

Top
 Profile  
yentass
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 9:28 am
Posts: 927
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:29 pm 
 

At zorg85 and oneyoudontknow, I'd better flag these, since I don't think mods visit here anymore, apart from this time when Nightgaunt hopped by (likely after looking up his alias in the search function)



...:oh shit:

EDIT: While I'm at it, does somebody know if it's ok to submit the same review for a split album for every band that participates in it?
_________________
Voidal, Doom/Death Metulz.
kingnuuuur wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
I know nothing of hair care, so bare with me.

Metal dudes, assemble in the shower!

Top
 Profile  
oneyoudontknow
Cum insantientibus furere necesse est.

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 5343
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 2:39 pm 
 

yentass wrote:
At zorg85 and oneyoudontknow, I'd better flag these, since I don't think mods visit here anymore, apart from this time when Nightgaunt hopped by (likely after looking up his alias in the search function)



...:oh shit:

Well, this thread should be without discussion and for the mere purpose of posting links to reviews which should be deleted... maybe this would prevent the cluttering a bit.

edit: or one or two additional mods ...
_________________

My website which contains reviews as well as interviews:
https://adsol.oneyoudontknow.com
My podcast:
https://adsolmag.bandcamp.com/

Top
 Profile  
Napero
GedankenPanzer

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:16 pm
Posts: 8817
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:13 pm 
 

Ooo, Whacking Day, oooh Whacking Daaayyy...

A strange case of mosaic plagiarism. While that does not quite fill the definition of complete plagiarism, I nuked the review and hit the fellow with 500 points of penalty. Further, no one shall ever again approve a review from him, and he shall be dursted if anything by him appears in the queue again.

Thank you, perceptive fellow.
_________________
Chest wounds suck (when properly inflicted).
-Butch-

Top
 Profile  
Napero
GedankenPanzer

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:16 pm
Posts: 8817
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:16 pm 
 

caspian wrote:
I dunno, have there ever been any short 8 pointers? I find it unlikely.

I at least tried to award 8 points for the "enchanted vacuum cleaner" review a while back...
_________________
Chest wounds suck (when properly inflicted).
-Butch-

Top
 Profile  
oneyoudontknow
Cum insantientibus furere necesse est.

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 5343
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:19 pm 
 

oneyoudontknow wrote:
I have a question for the enlightened mods:

What do these two reviews have in common?

http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=158542
Quote:
Oh Uriburu, Uriburu, Uriburu! What you’ve released here is borderline torture to sit through! To be able to call this music would be doing a serious injustice to the underground Noise scene. I think perhaps the definition of the word “music” in the dictionary needs to be revised ASAP, for “Enki’s Age Approaches” has near-nigh tarnished the definition of the word, and the fact that this is the second demo by this band gives me grave cause for concern. Surely after their first attempt they’d have realised that something was seriously wrong with the music they were writing? Obviously not.

The mixing on this demo is dire. The drums are far too high in the mix to the extent that Uriburu might as well have just recorded some drum tracks and released them instead of even bothering to record guitars and vocals. Ironically they went some way to doing this with the fifth track as that was just a drum recording, for all of 15 seconds. And please don’t get me started on the guitars, it’s as if it’s just one continuous note being played over a whole track at a time, making for tracks that get on your nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves.

To be able to draw a single positive from this demo is proving extremely difficult, though by clutching at some very distant straws it could be said that a positive is that the only way is up from here on out! I can’t really see music getting much worse at all, even if I strained my mind to come up with something. It might have been better if they just didn’t record anything and stayed in the rehearsal room until their playing wasn’t causing the dog to pine.

As a final bit and byte, it might have been a better idea to have named this demo “My Death Approaches”, because I feel like I’ve just stuck one foot in my own grave. I’m off to listen to some music that might dig me out of this horrible mess.

Smell The Stench, looks like you’ve got a band that needs signing.


http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=154183
Quote:
Oh Tzelmoth! What you’ve released here is borderline torture to sit through! To be able to call this music would be doing a serious injustice to the underground Noise scene. I think perhaps the definition of the word “music” in the dictionary needs to be revised ASAP, for “Enki’s Age Approaches” has near-nigh tarnished the definition of the word, and the fact that this is the first demo by this South American band gives me grave cause for concern. Surely after their first attempt they’d have realised that something was seriously wrong with the music they were writing? Obviously not.

The mixing on this demo is dire. The drums are far too high in the mix to the extent that Tzelmoth might as well have just recorded some drum tracks and released them instead of even bothering to record guitars and vocals. Ironically they went some way to doing this with the fifth track as that was just a drum recording, for all of 15 seconds. And please don’t get me started on the guitars, it’s as if it’s just one continuous note being played over a whole track at a time, making for tracks that get on your nerves, get on your nerves, get on your nerves.

To be able to draw a single positive from this demo is proving extremely difficult, though by clutching at some very distant straws it could be said that a positive is that the only way is up from here on out! I can’t really see music getting much worse at all, even if I strained my mind to come up with something. It might have been better if they just didn’t record anything and stayed in the rehearsal room until their playing wasn’t causing the dog to pine.

As a final bit and byte, it might have been a better idea to have named this demo “My Death Approaches”, because I feel like I’ve just stuck one foot in my own grave. I’m off to listen to some music that might dig me out of this horrible mess.

Smell The Stench, looks like you’ve got a band that needs signing.

and what about this Napero? ... or any other mod who is in charge of this stuff?
_________________

My website which contains reviews as well as interviews:
https://adsol.oneyoudontknow.com
My podcast:
https://adsolmag.bandcamp.com/

Top
 Profile  
Napero
GedankenPanzer

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 4:16 pm
Posts: 8817
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:20 pm 
 

I just nuked them.
_________________
Chest wounds suck (when properly inflicted).
-Butch-

Top
 Profile  
oneyoudontknow
Cum insantientibus furere necesse est.

Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 6:25 pm
Posts: 5343
Location: Germany
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 3:24 pm 
 

Napero wrote:
I just nuked them.

thank you
_________________

My website which contains reviews as well as interviews:
https://adsol.oneyoudontknow.com
My podcast:
https://adsolmag.bandcamp.com/

Top
 Profile  
heavymetalbackwards
Metalhead

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 4:49 am
Posts: 1940
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2010 6:48 pm 
 

Ilwhyan wrote:
heavymetalbackwards wrote:
Voice_of_Reason wrote:
Ilwhyan wrote:
MetalSupremacy has a points-per-review ratio of less than 5, which I believe says quite a bit.


Most reviewers have a point to review ratio slightly lower than five for the simple reason that most people never get eight points, but do have a three pointer or two.


Agreed. It's when the average is less 4 that you know there's a problem.
Getting threepointers is pretty bad though.


Many great reviewers on this site have had 0-pointers (reviews rejected), if I'm not mistaken.

Top
 Profile  
Tonyr
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 193
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:25 am 
 

Found a review of Cliteater's Clit 'Em All that's rather short... Three of the six sentences in HemlockxSociety's review contain (lacking) descriptions. Is what is essentially a three-sentence review good enough for the archives?
_________________
For Sale | For Trade

Top
 Profile  
yentass
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 9:28 am
Posts: 927
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:36 am 
 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=220398#163065 (paranj's one)

The formatting is quite painful to watch.
_________________
Voidal, Doom/Death Metulz.
kingnuuuur wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
I know nothing of hair care, so bare with me.

Metal dudes, assemble in the shower!

Top
 Profile  
Tonyr
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 193
PostPosted: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:39 pm 
 

Demon_of_the_Fall's review of Metal Church's The Human Factor (at the bottom of the page) is a bit lacking. His descriptions are general enough that they could easily be used to describe any of Metal Church's contemporaries.
_________________
For Sale | For Trade

Top
 Profile  
Tonyr
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 193
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:56 pm 
 

The review of Diamond Head's To Heaven from Hell by Snxke is short and devoid of description. With DoctorX's new review of the compilation, I don't see any reason to keep the first one.
_________________
For Sale | For Trade

Top
 Profile  
OzzyApu
Metal freak

Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2006 12:11 am
Posts: 10821
Location: Seattle
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:56 pm 
 

I don't know why this one by optimuszgrime was accepted: http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=474#141800

It's 2 paragraphs of bitching about why Dan Swano doesn't know what the hell he's doing anymore and the third paragraph is still more bitching. There is very little musical description on the song itself, which is funny because it's 1 forty minute song that you could easily go into. He assumes we know what Edge of Sanity sounds like, which explains his lack of content related to the MUSIC.

Honestly, this isn't a music review - it's a post belonging on the forum.
_________________
gomorro wrote:
Yesterday was the birthday of school pal and I met the chick of my sigh (I've talked about here before, the she-wolf I use to be inlove with)... Maaan she was using a mini-skirt too damn insane... Dude you could saw her entire soul every time she sit...

Top
 Profile  
Tonyr
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 193
PostPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:44 pm 
 

OzzyApu wrote:
I don't know why this one by optimuszgrime was accepted: http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=474#141800

It's 2 paragraphs of bitching about why Dan Swano doesn't know what the hell he's doing anymore and the third paragraph is still more bitching. There is very little musical description on the song itself, which is funny because it's 1 forty minute song that you could easily go into. He assumes we know what Edge of Sanity sounds like, which explains his lack of content related to the MUSIC.

Honestly, this isn't a music review - it's a post belonging on the forum.


Seconded. He even has the audacity to say that the album contains "ambient" and "drone", when there is very little of the former to be heard during the 40 minutes and absolutely none of the latter. Nevermind his pathetic whining, he doesn't even accurately describe the music with the little description he gives. Axe this one.
_________________
For Sale | For Trade

Top
 Profile  
Voice_of_Reason
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 665
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:35 am 
 

What's with the zeal (seemingly) to get older, shorter reviews removed? Not like you get points for them, and barring cases of blatant misinformation, what does it hurt to keep them? So the standards are higher now, doesn't mean the older reviews are suddenly invalid.
_________________
Evolution is a religion and science leads to killing people.

Top
 Profile  
DevilsWhorehouse
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:14 am
Posts: 259
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:42 am 
 

Down - NOLA

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=196#560

Quote:
This album is a classic, no doubt about it. - 95%
Written by Throat_Slasher on December 11th, 2002

Put aside all the Exhorder/Pantera bickering, forget the glam make-up, and PLEASE don't ever let me hear Pantera's song, Pussy Tight ever again. But i will listen to Down's 1995 effort named NOLA as many times as i can in a night. Phil Anselmo, Pepper Keenan, J. Bower, Todd "Don't forget to pass that box of donuts my way" Strange, and Kirk Windstein all mainly from Pantera, C.O.C. Eyehategod and Crowbar unveiled the legendary NOLA. Mr. Phil-core himself provides the vocals on this album which are very similar to his Pantera bark, but sometimes he sings as if he were fronting Lynyrd Skynyrd, which isn't a bad thing at all. Of all the albums i have heard Jimmy Bower play the drumkit on, this one stands out as being the best in my mind. One might describe these guys as the Black Sabbath of the Southern US. Stand-out tracks include: Lifer, Temptation's Wings, Eyes of the South, Bury Me in Smoke, and Hail the Leaf. So if you feel like banging your head, get up off your ass and buy this album.
_________________
...please let me die in solitude

Top
 Profile  
Tonyr
Metal newbie

Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 7:15 pm
Posts: 193
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:52 am 
 

Voice_of_Reason wrote:
What's with the zeal (seemingly) to get older, shorter reviews removed? Not like you get points for them, and barring cases of blatant misinformation, what does it hurt to keep them? So the standards are higher now, doesn't mean the older reviews are suddenly invalid.


I wouldn't call it zeal; I don't purposefully hunt down reviews that I think are bad. I just mention ones I come across that seem to speak more about the circumstances surrounding the first listen of the album than the actual music. Or ones that use vague words like "brutal" or "good" too much. These aren't very helpful in my opinion, but it's just that: my opinion. If the admins think it's fine, then that's the final word, though I suppose it wouldn't hurt to at least bring notice to some reviews of seemingly lesser quality.

I don't feel biased towards older reviews simply because they're old. Some reviews by UltraBoris that were written several years ago are good reading despite their length (or lack thereof) because they provide some semblance of a description.
_________________
For Sale | For Trade

Top
 Profile  
Voice_of_Reason
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 665
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:00 am 
 

I didn't mean you personally, just guys posting older reviews in here in general (which does include you)...
_________________
Evolution is a religion and science leads to killing people.

Top
 Profile  
yentass
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 9:28 am
Posts: 927
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:21 pm 
 

Voice_of_Reason wrote:
What's with the zeal (seemingly) to get older, shorter reviews removed? Not like you get points for them, and barring cases of blatant misinformation, what does it hurt to keep them? So the standards are higher now, doesn't mean the older reviews are suddenly invalid.


What's wrong with that? No one said they're invalid, it's not like these authors are docked for points either if their reviews are being oven foddered, but if the starndards were raised - why shouldn't the older one meet them?
When I've learned what the new standards are, I took the time to re-re-rewrite my older ones, just the most logical thing to do if you care enough about your reviews being kept here.

Here's a newer one, anyway http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=201852#118116. Formatting.
EDIT: Shit, scratch that, this one is even worse:http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=2671#118116
And what's up with the "ov"s on this one?
_________________
Voidal, Doom/Death Metulz.
kingnuuuur wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
I know nothing of hair care, so bare with me.

Metal dudes, assemble in the shower!

Top
 Profile  
hakarl
Metel fraek

Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:41 pm
Posts: 8817
Location: Finland
PostPosted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:03 pm 
 

heavymetalbackwards wrote:
Ilwhyan wrote:
heavymetalbackwards wrote:
Voice_of_Reason wrote:
Ilwhyan wrote:
MetalSupremacy has a points-per-review ratio of less than 5, which I believe says quite a bit.


Most reviewers have a point to review ratio slightly lower than five for the simple reason that most people never get eight points, but do have a three pointer or two.


Agreed. It's when the average is less 4 that you know there's a problem.
Getting threepointers is pretty bad though.


Many great reviewers on this site have had 0-pointers (reviews rejected), if I'm not mistaken.
Yes, and Celtic Frost released Cold Lake. Even if the reviewer is a good writer, it doesn't mean all his reviews are good. My reviews have not once been rejected for content related reasons, and look, they're really not very special. Some are quite terrible even, in my opinion.

As for the correlation of points and length, yes, 8 points usually seems to require comprehensive analysis of the release in question. However, it's not hard to get five points with short reviews. Going straight to the point doesn't equal insufficient analysis or musical description. I've been given 5 points for 3 paragraphs and less than 500 words, and they could've been shorter. However, make them much shorter and they will lose the little point that they have, effectively becoming "guitars play riffs, bass plods, drums do that". Of course it's possible, for a skillful writer, to write descriptive and even somewhat in-depth reviews that are even shorter, but that is quite rare.
_________________
"A glimpse of light is all that it takes to illuminate the darkness."

Top
 Profile  
Mishalra
Metal newbie

Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:21 pm
Posts: 60
Location: Australia
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:37 am 
 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3989#36072

Is posting a link sufficient or do I have to paste the review here too?

Most of his other reviews seem pretty useless too.

Top
 Profile  
~Guest 76452
Metal freak

Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 8:40 pm
Posts: 4414
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:42 am 
 

Mishalra wrote:
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3989#36072

Is posting a link sufficient or do I have to paste the review here too?

Most of his other reviews seem pretty useless too.

Nah, a link is fine. I deleted that review.

Top
 Profile  
KerberosOfHades
Metalhead

Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 12:40 am
Posts: 485
Location: New Zealand
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 3:06 pm 
 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 7570#13041

InnersoulDarkness666's review.

Poorly formatted, minimal music description (only talks about song stucture and the anime cartoon-sounding vocalist), some whining about bands jumping on the Evanescence bandwagon, the ... phenomenon and a factual inaccuracy - there are harsh vocals on this album which are pretty prominent in places too.
_________________
BastardHead wrote:
Haikus are dang sweet
but I suck at them. Penis.
I ran out of words.

Top
 Profile  
Rild
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 619
Location: Vancouver
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:54 am 
 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1500#30873

Crappy track-by-track from a very obviously ESL Mr. Deceiver85, who stumbles over his English frequently. The review above it is also pretty much just as bad.

Top
 Profile  
yentass
Metalhead

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 9:28 am
Posts: 927
Location: Israel
PostPosted: Sun Feb 07, 2010 1:36 pm 
 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=243721#217540

Zero content on topic - besides stating that the album is short.
_________________
Voidal, Doom/Death Metulz.
kingnuuuur wrote:
DoomMetalAlchemist wrote:
I know nothing of hair care, so bare with me.

Metal dudes, assemble in the shower!

Top
 Profile  
Razakel
Nekroprince

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:36 pm
Posts: 6234
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:16 am 
 

I'm not sure if this breaks rules, but in droneriot's review for In Flames' Lunar Strain, he says:

Quote:
I have to be honest with you and admit that I wrote a large portion of this review from very distant memory, only from what I remembered from hearing the album just once about six or seven years ago.


Come on now. It's pretty obvious that he doesn't remember what the album sounds like because he doesn't talk about the music hardly at all, despite the long length of the review. It's mostly just a strange essay about bands changing their sound and selling out. The review isn't helpful at all for someone who wants to read about the album. He mentions Iron Maiden and Darkthrone just as much as he mentions In Flames in the review, which doesn't make much sense to me because the album doesn't sound like either of those bands. Anyway, not sure if this is nuke-worthy, but it's pretty fucking useless.

Top
 Profile  
Voice_of_Reason
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 665
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:29 am 
 

Razakel wrote:
I'm not sure if this breaks rules, but in droneriot's review for In Flames' Lunar Strain, he says:

Quote:
I have to be honest with you and admit that I wrote a large portion of this review from very distant memory, only from what I remembered from hearing the album just once about six or seven years ago.


Come on now. It's pretty obvious that he doesn't remember what the album sounds like because he doesn't talk about the music hardly at all, despite the long length of the review. It's mostly just a strange essay about bands changing their sound and selling out. The review isn't helpful at all for someone who wants to read about the album. He mentions Iron Maiden and Darkthrone just as much as he mentions In Flames in the review, which doesn't make much sense to me because the album doesn't sound like either of those bands. Anyway, not sure if this is nuke-worthy, but it's pretty fucking useless.


I guess you missed all the parts where he ties it together and the review gives you an accurate description of the experience of listening to that album.

Anyway, Sigillum_Dei_Ameth's review of "Cruelty and the Beast" needs to go. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=69#134154

The reason is because it is stupid and tacky. The title, and the warning at the beginning of the review make sure you know he definitely got a blowjob at age 14 because of that cd, then after a short but ok review, he just deigns to mention the blowjob he made such a big deal of letting you know about in a completely offhand way, then the review is over. Why bother bringing up the fact that he got a blowjob at age 14 becuase of that review, twice, in the title, and in a PARENTAL ADVISORY style warning if he's not even going to actually tell the story and how it could possibly relate to his review of the album? It's not like the event seems to have affected his feelings towards the music, so it's just pointless, not to mention extremely tacky.
_________________
Evolution is a religion and science leads to killing people.

Top
 Profile  
Razakel
Nekroprince

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:36 pm
Posts: 6234
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:58 am 
 

Voice_of_Reason wrote:
Razakel wrote:
I'm not sure if this breaks rules, but in droneriot's review for In Flames' Lunar Strain, he says:

Quote:
I have to be honest with you and admit that I wrote a large portion of this review from very distant memory, only from what I remembered from hearing the album just once about six or seven years ago.


Come on now. It's pretty obvious that he doesn't remember what the album sounds like because he doesn't talk about the music hardly at all, despite the long length of the review. It's mostly just a strange essay about bands changing their sound and selling out. The review isn't helpful at all for someone who wants to read about the album. He mentions Iron Maiden and Darkthrone just as much as he mentions In Flames in the review, which doesn't make much sense to me because the album doesn't sound like either of those bands. Anyway, not sure if this is nuke-worthy, but it's pretty fucking useless.


I guess you missed all the parts where he ties it together and the review gives you an accurate description of the experience of listening to that album.


Well I read the review, so no, I didn't miss anything. But I dare not doubt the almighty Voice of Reason.

Top
 Profile  
MaDTransilvanian
Caravan Beyond Redemption

Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:56 pm
Posts: 3789
Location: Romania
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:02 am 
 

Razakel wrote:
Voice_of_Reason wrote:
Razakel wrote:
I'm not sure if this breaks rules, but in droneriot's review for In Flames' Lunar Strain, he says:

Quote:
I have to be honest with you and admit that I wrote a large portion of this review from very distant memory, only from what I remembered from hearing the album just once about six or seven years ago.


Come on now. It's pretty obvious that he doesn't remember what the album sounds like because he doesn't talk about the music hardly at all, despite the long length of the review. It's mostly just a strange essay about bands changing their sound and selling out. The review isn't helpful at all for someone who wants to read about the album. He mentions Iron Maiden and Darkthrone just as much as he mentions In Flames in the review, which doesn't make much sense to me because the album doesn't sound like either of those bands. Anyway, not sure if this is nuke-worthy, but it's pretty fucking useless.


I guess you missed all the parts where he ties it together and the review gives you an accurate description of the experience of listening to that album.


Well I read the review, so no, I didn't miss anything. But I dare not doubt the almighty Voice of Reason.


That review really does describe other, unrelated things much more than it does the actual album in question.

Top
 Profile  
Voice_of_Reason
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 665
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:15 am 
 

That's not a problem, since it also describes the album at hand, so anything extra he discusses is just bonus food for thought. It's all connected, so I hardly see how that's a negative in any sense.

Razakel wrote:
I dare not doubt the almighty Voice of Reason.


That is a very wise policy. ;-)
_________________
Evolution is a religion and science leads to killing people.

Top
 Profile  
Razakel
Nekroprince

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 8:36 pm
Posts: 6234
Location: Canada
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:30 am 
 

You actually take yourself seriously, don't you?

Top
 Profile  
Voice_of_Reason
Metalhead

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 5:38 pm
Posts: 665
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:35 am 
 

I guess you don't understand the significance of the winking emoticon. Must be a cultural thing.
_________________
Evolution is a religion and science leads to killing people.

Top
 Profile  
WebOfPiss
Myopic Void

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 7:17 pm
Posts: 3025
Location: Presidio Modelo
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:53 am 
 

VibrationsOfDoom's review has some pretty terrible formatting. Sure it's probably the most informative of the lot, but damn is it tough on the eyes.

http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=141615

Assuming my computer isn't going bonkers on me...

Top
 Profile  
iamntbatman
Chaos Breed

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 11421
Location: Tyrn Gorthad
PostPosted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 6:28 am 
 

Nope, looks like crap here, too. I'm assuming he wrote it in Notepad and just hit enter every time it got to the edge of the page.
_________________
Nolan_B wrote:
I've been punched in the face maybe 3 times in the past 6 months


GLOAMING - death/doom | COMA VOID - black/doom/post-rock

Top
 Profile  
ThePipster
Metal newbie

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 115
Location: United States of America
PostPosted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:22 pm 
 

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=11920

The one by HellishBlasphemy can go. It has bad formatting, and little description.

Top
 Profile  
DevilsWhorehouse
Metal newbie

Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 8:14 am
Posts: 259
PostPosted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 3:13 am 
 

Candlemass - Lucifer Rising

http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 5980#23414

[quote]Is Candlemass, Is good. - 87%
Written by caspian on November 27th, 2008

Being a pretty massive fan of “King of the Grey Islandsâ€
_________________
...please let me die in solitude

Top
 Profile  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic Go to page Previous  1 ... 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150 ... 239  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

  Print view
Jump to:  

Back to the Encyclopaedia Metallum


Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group