| Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives https://forum.metal-archives.com/ |
|
| Oven Fodder (AKA Why was this review accepted? Provide LINKS, please) https://forum.metal-archives.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=4153 |
Page 153 of 239 |
| Author: | failsafeman [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 9:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ribos wrote: xexyzl wrote: KerberosOfHades wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=219956#208330 Pretty much the same I thought. I was wondering if perhaps the reviewer didn't know English very well but after reading some of his other reviews I don't think that's the case.Good musical description but looks like it was sent through a translator or something. The sentences don't make sense. Maybe it was intentional and we just don't get it? Well, I found something interesting with regards to this. I checked his website that he links to in most of his reviews, and found a couple reviews that might explain this inconsistency: http://www.brutalism.com/content/ulcera ... ng-is-fire http://www.brutalism.com/content/the-fi ... st-the-end Both reviews are posted here on the Archives. Now, if you scroll down, you find that they were written for said website by two different reviewers. Likewise, the Sikfuk review is from a third person. I'm sure there are other cases of this. Sounds like we've got ourselves a case of plagiarism on our hands! We're looking into it. The reviews are going to be up for just a bit longer, but rest assured they will be deleted when we're done. |
|
| Author: | SharpAndSlender [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3702 This says just barely over nothing. |
|
| Author: | EntilZha [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Additional sucker points for trying to use BBCode (:durr:) and for calling it their debut album. |
|
| Author: | Razakel [ Thu Apr 15, 2010 10:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
SharpAndSlender wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=3702
This says just barely over nothing. But it's from 2002. Isn't that like taking down a heritage building? |
|
| Author: | Zoldaten_ov_Zatan [ Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I've made that argument before, and it really doesn't work so well.
|
|
| Author: | Razakel [ Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
This is ratsalad's review for Borknagar's debut: Quote: This album, to me, is really... bland. Apart from the odd acoustic folky moments, there is absolutely nothing to distinguish this band from the rest of the black metal crop, and, therefore, no real reason to listen to this above any other album.
Granted, there is absolutely nothing BAD about the album at all. It is perfectly passable black metal. The production is suitably raw enough, the guitars chainsaw-esque, the drums blast/double bass filled. The one criticism I'd have is of the clean vocals. When they are implemented to actually sing lyrics, they are fantastic, adding a good layer of atmosphere to the music. All too often, however, they merely make use of a gregorian chant style thing, which just sounds like bad keyboards. Hell, maybe it is. Borknagar are, of course, more famous for their clean-vocalled folk metal approach which they have nowadays. I'd have to say that I am glad, because this release is significantly underwhelming. One can see the roots of the unique sound that the band has these days, but that alone is no real reason to buy, or even necessarily listen to, this album http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1884 Pretty useless I'd say, especially considering the more well written reviews for the album. It doesn't say much at all about the music and doesn't even make a whole lot of sense with sentences like "there is absolutely nothing BAD about the album at all", when the rest of the paragraph is dedicated to talking about how he hates the vocals. Neverless, the term "clean-vocalled folk metal" is pretty interesting. |
|
| Author: | EntilZha [ Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Always remember to read the thread title before posting. |
|
| Author: | SharpAndSlender [ Mon Apr 19, 2010 11:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=90576#60738 Since there's a much more in depth review above it now I think the old one is too bare bones and lacking musical description to justify keeping. |
|
| Author: | Zoldaten_ov_Zatan [ Mon Apr 19, 2010 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh c'mon. Nok's reviews don't invalidate anyone's efforts. |
|
| Author: | Pfuntner [ Wed Apr 21, 2010 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=13583#1657 He gives the album a 90, then spends the majority of the review talking about how he broke the album and claims that the band is bad at songwriting, has generic vocals, and that the songs go on for too long. Something doesn't add up. |
|
| Author: | KerberosOfHades [ Fri Apr 23, 2010 1:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1674#2327 Review by Winterkaelte. Very short and no description outside of "good". It's a pretty old review (been there nearly 7 years) and its obsolete now, really. The two above it are pretty short but have somewhat better musical description - the mods may want to look at them as well. |
|
| Author: | OzzyApu [ Mon Apr 26, 2010 12:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I knew these Thor's Hammer reviews were too fluffy to be real. This band hasn't seen a review later than 2005, but I'll be giving a run through them this coming weekend - it'll be my return (in a way) from my lull in reviewing. But to the point - http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=23580 The reviewer VITHOLF does not talk about the music except one line referring to Bathory and Possessed. Literally, you read the review and it's just him spewing more anti-judeo-christian bullshit (the way he does it). No musical description whatsoever - he just supports what Capricornus was doing and says that you need to hear the album. Honestly, nuke this garbage. |
|
| Author: | Zoldaten_ov_Zatan [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 3:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
That other one can go too, not much better. Plus they are both 100's. What the hell? Who could like that album that much, it's consistently annoying (a Thor's Hammer proof of concept, apparently). Crazy world... |
|
| Author: | Pallando [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This is the magic to describe Maiden Japan, but which is this? He is talking about fanclub release, just whoa! Words flourishes and agendas clash. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=2384#69018 To be honest, I don't know if this surreal masterpiece belongs here or in the "really really funny reviews" thread but one thing is sure: Engrish (Finnglish?) of this quality has become rare on Metal Archives. |
|
| Author: | Napero [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 6:44 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Gone. In the future, mention the review author, will ya? Eases our job and ensures your message gets heard. |
|
| Author: | Rild [ Tue Apr 27, 2010 9:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
OzzyApu wrote: I knew these Thor's Hammer reviews were too fluffy to be real. This band hasn't seen a review later than 2005, but I'll be giving a run through them this coming weekend - it'll be my return (in a way) from my lull in reviewing.
But to the point - http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=23580 The reviewer VITHOLF does not talk about the music except one line referring to Bathory and Possessed. Literally, you read the review and it's just him spewing more anti-judeo-christian bullshit (the way he does it). No musical description whatsoever - he just supports what Capricornus was doing and says that you need to hear the album. Honestly, nuke this garbage. Vitholf is in Fanisk; your argument is invalid. |
|
| Author: | OzzyApu [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 12:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
That makes sense, but it still doesn't excuse the review from being nothing but a mouthful of shit having nothing to do with actually describing the music aside from one sentence. |
|
| Author: | Radagast [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 5:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=4475 Both reviews for this album are really quite poor, very minimal musical description. |
|
| Author: | DevilsWhorehouse [ Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Nightwish's Oceanborn could do with a cleanup. I'm sure MA could stand to lose a good number of the 19 reviews already published. Here's a particularly fecal example. http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=134#18992 Quote: OH yeah, this is Nightwish! - 96%
Written by Sum on October 19th, 2004 Well since the first album Angels Fall First, this is one hell of an improvement, as Oceanborn makes his way in my top 5 favorite albums. If you are looking for really heavy metal, turn back, this isnt for you. Only 2 or 3 of the songs are really heavy, the others are more melodic, and even soft. Also, you must expect lots of keyboards in this, and less noticable guitar than in most other metal albums. Now there is THE thing that makes it quite different : vocals. Whoa, yes Tarja is one HELL of a singer, and she will create fabulous harmonies that will most likely make you enjoy the album. Concerning the guitars, well, i love them, the tone is great and the rare solos that there are are always welcome, obviously, in this instrumental band, it doesn't stand out much but it still contributes to the music's whole ensemble (which is amazing). The drumming and bass are quite standard, but never noisy, so they will never ruin a song. As for the lyrics, they are often about love or dont make much sense (to me), but i don't care, since i praticaly never understand them at first, hehe. And conerning the feeling, all you really feel when listening to that music is admiration a)for the vocals b)the different instruments perfectly mixed together. Highlight songs : Gethsemane : Man, this song simply has it all, the chorus is heavier than most nightwish riffs, the verses are particularly operatic and the break is a soft string interlude. what else can you possibly wish for?! A Solo! And this song has one. Sum it up and you got one hell of a song. Moondance : For once, Tarja decides to shut up! Yep, in this little instrumental song, you will also find heavy-melodic-soft parts, and sometimes a mix of all. Another good thing about this tune is that little flute interlude, which is always welcome. And this one has a quite unique feeling of excitement, unlike most songs you will hear. Bottom line : This is an excellent album for any fan of opera or instrumental metal, because you got a good mix of both! And unless you are quite closed-minded and have a strict opinion on power metal, you will probably enjoy this. The closest comparison i can think of would be Dark Moor or Fairyland. Good listen! |
|
| Author: | heavyyield [ Sun May 02, 2010 2:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
On Carcass' Embodiment single: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=45741 ---------------------- Good melodic death - 82% Written by stickyshooZ on September 3rd, 2004 This single, for the vast majority, is very steady. Smooth and crunchy guitars strum along with many chug riffs at mid-pace, keeping this melodic death song very straightforward and heavy hitting. Nothing really goes wild and shreds at high velocity with the exception of the solos - this is just a nice rhythmic head banger. The melodic factor appears often over the comely rhythm guitar to ensure that the song soars off the ground a bit while companied by stark harmonization and a few wailing pinch harmonics. Much like the guitars, the drums are just as weighty and rarely speed up - this shows the definite competence of musicianship being that the fundamental structure of the song completely matches up with all of the instrumental factors. Bill Steer's vocals are the classic call of raspy death metal harshness. Surprisingly, Alexi Laiho's vocals somewhat resembles Steer's, only Steer's style is slower and deeper on the tonal level. The clear production makes for a more pleasurable listen since everything can be heard clearly and is more bearable to listen to than their early fashion of gritty production. Finally, less grind and more death metal with an injection of melody. The rhythm is much more dominant, but the lead melodies appear from time to time. Carcass tends to use less melody than other melo-death bands like Dismember, so don't expect a very hardy melodic deliverance (at least compared to bands similar to the aforementioned). "Embodiment" is definitely a good listen from the melodic death side of Carcass. ------------------------ In case you missed it: Bill Steer's vocals are the classic call of raspy death metal harshness. How the HELL did that get through the review check? |
|
| Author: | ~Guest 193166 [ Tue May 04, 2010 12:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=2372 The reviews written by judasiscariot and vulture (respectively on August 1st and July 17th of 2004). The former is probably a larger candidate/target for removal here, though it contains more (again, non-musical) content. judasiscariot wrote: Regardless, this is pure black metal and Judas Iscariot is a driving force of anti-christianity.
|
|
| Author: | Empyreal [ Fri May 07, 2010 11:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 9594#84169 Worthless. He spends a ton of time describing the people who made the album, and doesn't even really talk about the music at all. The formatting is awful, and he actually tells us to 'check it out for ourselves' to hear what it sounds like, rather than describing it: Quote: The first song is pretty uptempo and seems to be straightforward. That is, until you reach about the 2nd minute or so. I'm not going to tell what they did, you'll have to find out yourself.
Then, the second song kicks in. A whole different mood, a whole different tempo. We hear a clean chorus, more variation in the grunt. The 3rd song is even slower, but has a dark, fragile mood. More clean vocals. The 4th song is a lot more technical, but not as much as the 6th. Hell, just find out yourselves. There's something for everyone. Wow, just wow. |
|
| Author: | Xeroxification [ Sat May 08, 2010 11:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
iamntbatman wrote: Thanks. Maybe I'll get around to reviewing this beast at some point.
Here's another, the new review by Xeroxification: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=30982#196576 He refers to the other reviewer by name and the entire review is basically written as a response to Sargon_The_Terrible's negative review. Hmm. I understand the reason for its removal. I thought I did have musical description in there though, might I have been notified about it so I could fix it? |
|
| Author: | sushiman [ Sun May 16, 2010 9:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=6322#135115 I've never joined in on Oven Fodder before, but this thing must be nuked. It's a review of Vondur's Striðsyfirlýsing with: An opening making a sweeping, unfounded statement. A paragraph claiming that Vondur must be cold because they are from Iceland, and are therefore very black metal. A paragraph about the artwork including a cringy joke about Hiroshima and Nagasaki. A paragraph bemoaning the fact that the album did not enclose a razorblade, as promised. A paragraph about how listening to the album on drugs makes it better, although the only supporting evidence is more discussion of the booklet. Finally, some musical description. One brief, vague, poorly written paragraph of it. A conclusion claiming that Vondur are rulers of the universe and that the album is a classic, despite the fact he has only given it a 75%. |
|
| Author: | Nightgaunt [ Sun May 16, 2010 4:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
That's refuse, for sure. Deleted. |
|
| Author: | Visionary [ Tue May 18, 2010 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Empyreal wrote: http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=269594#84169 Worthless. He spends a ton of time describing the people who made the album, and doesn't even really talk about the music at all. The formatting is awful, and he actually tells us to 'check it out for ourselves' to hear what it sounds like, rather than describing it: Quote: The first song is pretty uptempo and seems to be straightforward. That is, until you reach about the 2nd minute or so. I'm not going to tell what they did, you'll have to find out yourself. Then, the second song kicks in. A whole different mood, a whole different tempo. We hear a clean chorus, more variation in the grunt. The 3rd song is even slower, but has a dark, fragile mood. More clean vocals. The 4th song is a lot more technical, but not as much as the 6th. Hell, just find out yourselves. There's something for everyone. Wow, just wow. And that whole review is terrible.Bottom review by Flamos Quote: Tim Owens is like a vocal whore; he’s been in so many bands for a somewhat short carrier. Now, he’s finally released a solo album. You’d figure this would be a sure fire winner, mainly because of how good his vocals actually are. That being said, this album is completely awful. Yes, terrible. How’d that happen?
Well, lets dissect this piece of shit little by little. Tim Owens himself is not bad here, however they lyrics are horrible. Actually, they’re pretty funny. You’ll laugh at songs like “The Cover Up.” The writing is so bad I laughed. Now, it would be easy to ignore if the music itself was good. However, it’s the opposite. Every song here, and I mean every song here is completely uninteresting. I’ve listened to the entire record three times, and I can’t find anything positive besides the production and guitar solos. What the hell happened? There’s an array of “all-stars” that appear here, but who cares. The music sucks overall, but some of the solos here are cool. From the opener “Starting Over” to the ending “The Shadows are Alive” you’ll wish you’d never had bought this. Disappointment will overtake you. It’s hard to point out a good track here… oh wait, there isn’t one. Don't get excited. I can’t believe I was actually excited for this piece, now I feel retarded. This should’ve been awesome, solid heavy metal with The Ripper owning your ears with an iron fist. However, it just feels he’s raping them of money and for your eardrums to bleed. Shit, this isn’t even worth a download. Avoid this like the plague; it’ll make you want to punch babies. http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=237043 Only musical description is crappy lyrics and uninteresting music except for a good production and good solos. 4 other reviews that are much better so it isn't really needed. |
|
| Author: | MacMoney [ Thu May 20, 2010 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
EntilZha wrote: Additional sucker points for trying to use BBCode (:durr:) and for calling it their debut album.
Granted there isn't much at all in ways of description, but for the other stuff: it's a copypaste of a forum-version hence the forgotten BBCode, the flyers that came with the promo called it their debut and at the time, that self-released album was marked as a demo. |
|
| Author: | SharpAndSlender [ Thu May 20, 2010 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.ph ... 0754#46538 This is really, really incoherent and I'm about to do a review of it myself. |
|
| Author: | Lana [ Tue May 25, 2010 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1392#8829 Quote: Time To KILL! - 99%
Written by overkill67 on December 27th, 2004 Unadulterated, undeniably the essential and 2nd best disc ever to be compiled by New Jersey Thrash Gods Overkill. A fully completely well rounded effort that supports each and every qualitative element designed to fabricate the ultimate thrash metal experience. Here's how it works. In 1989, you take Blitz, DD, Sid and Bob, combined by the masterful production of Terry Date and what you end up with is The Years Of Decay. An album that brought a massive scaled audience into recognizing these guys as a force to be reckoned with. The one thing about this album that makes it so divine is the countless doubled guitar tracks that are recorded to fatten up the riffs. Not to mention some of the doubled leads that are absolutely genius. And I don't mean doubled as in harmonized either, I mean two totally different fucking guitar solos going on at same....what the fuck? Awesome! Check out Who Tends The Fire, and the Epic Skullkrusher for verification on that. Birth of Tension and Nothing To Die For are pretty much cut from the same cloth, in the sense that they are sonically driven ass kickers with double bass fueling the onslaught of bludgeoning thrash riffs. I Hate is sorta like the happy go lucky sing a long song(sorta has a punk style homage to it), however its still a true Kill song and has one hell of a catchy openinig riff ala judas priest style almost played in the same key as "hello from the gutter"...not quite the same but close. Time To Kill is reminiscent to something Nuclear Assault did on Survive but I can't quite put my finger on it. Just the same, its truly a qulity thrash song with great double bass patterns throughout and some awesome riot vocals. Elimination was the song that instantly sold me on this album. I remember seeing the video before the album was actually released in Canada, and holy fuck was I ever amazed at how much more aggressive and shred infested this band had become since their last effort. The Years Of Decay is probably one of the more subtle sounding Kill songs on this album, however it still posesses a great thrash riff mid way through and an awesome lead that is based totally on feel. Very epic sounding and very original in terms of its structure. Not your basic verse, chorus, verse chorus, solo verse bridge, and then back to chorus bullshit. This song is unique in many ways and truly must be heard to be appreciated. Lastly, we come to the closer, E.vil N.ever D.ies. Holy Fucking Shit! This could very possibly be the deadliest thrash song of its time. Although the intro is in fact similar to that of Damage Inc. by Metallica, thats where it stops. This frenzied, manical track is probably the crasziest sounding pit/mosh song of the eighties and surely one must assume that someone must have been stomped to death will Kill performed this savagery live. The lyrics have always been one of Overkill'[s high points and this album is no diffrent, many great lyrical ideas are represented and meaning is very easy to decipher form each of the songs. Bob Gustafson definately played his heart out on this album and everything from his tone, right down to his feel is fucking phenomenal. Eat your hear ou Zakk! Easily the best album of 1999, next to Laaz Rockit's Annihilation Principle Bad formatting, lots of errors, and below average music description among 18 other reviews (though there are probably a few others that need to be deleted as well). |
|
| Author: | OzzyApu [ Wed May 26, 2010 12:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Sinner's review for WASP's Inside the Electric Circus is less than bare-bones: http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1803#479 Hell, I hardly get anything from that review - you need to know what WASP sounds like ahead of time to even get what he's talking about in his 2 lines of description (hardly that). One of his statements is false, anyway, at least when you compare CDs by the band's past two albums and that one; the production on ITEC is louder and in fact deeper than the debut and TLC. UltraBoris' is also bare-bones, but at least it has more than 2 sentences worth of reasoning. |
|
| Author: | Visionary [ Wed May 26, 2010 1:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
OzzyApu wrote: Sinner's review for WASP's Inside the Electric Circus is less than bare-bones: http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1803#479
Hell, I hardly get anything from that review - you need to know what WASP sounds like ahead of time to even get what he's talking about in his 2 lines of description (hardly that). One of his statements is false, anyway, at least when you compare CDs by the band's past two albums and that one; the production on ITEC is louder and in fact deeper than the debut and TLC. UltraBoris' is also bare-bones, but at least it has more than 2 sentences worth of reasoning. Sinner only compares it to previous W.A.S.P. material. I got a review rejected for having most of my musical description comparing it to the bands former release even if it did have some independent description and it was the only review. My how standards have changed.
I'm not complaining though as it was a fair criticism of my review and I can beef it up if I get around to it. |
|
| Author: | OzzyApu [ Wed May 26, 2010 1:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
OK, but Sinner's is 5 sentences and with the standards of today, it doesn't really cut it. If those 5 sentences were packed with complete, vivid description, then I wouldn't be so picky about it. |
|
| Author: | Visionary [ Wed May 26, 2010 1:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
OzzyApu wrote: OK, but Sinner's is 5 sentences and with the standards of today, it doesn't really cut it. If those 5 sentences were packed with complete, vivid description, then I wouldn't be so picky about it.
Oh don't worry, I completely agree with you. |
|
| Author: | failsafeman [ Wed May 26, 2010 10:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
OK, everything has been cleaned up to this point. A lot of stuff at the top of the page had been skipped. Mods, when you're checking through these posts, don't just read the bottom ones.
For example, that guy asking to clean up the Oceanborn reviews WAS NOT KIDDING: A 12 year old wrote: This is a very enjoyable CD. Tarja's voice can make a strait man shoot a load in his pants. When you first listen to this CD you should have an extra pair of underwear. I am not a very big power metal fan. In fact most of it annoys me. But this is a very good CD.I think the music on this CD has kind of a Nintendo music sound to it. But more complex and thought out than Nintendo music. And Nintendo music does not have Tarja's amazing vocals. If I made a video game I would use this CD on it.
|
|
| Author: | Visionary [ Wed May 26, 2010 10:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
failsafeman wrote: For example, that guy asking to clean up the Oceanborn reviews WAS NOT KIDDING:
A 12 year old wrote: This is a very enjoyable CD. Tarja's voice can make a strait man shoot a load in his pants. When you first listen to this CD you should have an extra pair of underwear. I am not a very big power metal fan. In fact most of it annoys me. But this is a very good CD.I think the music on this CD has kind of a Nintendo music sound to it. But more complex and thought out than Nintendo music. And Nintendo music does not have Tarja's amazing vocals. If I made a video game I would use this CD on it. What are you talking about? That is easily worth 8 points. |
|
| Author: | EntilZha [ Wed May 26, 2010 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hmm, the UltraBoris one was good enough? Seemed like a rather skimpy track-by-track review (and not even mentioning all tracks at that.) |
|
| Author: | failsafeman [ Wed May 26, 2010 10:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh yeah, missed that one since OzzyApu mentioned the Sinner review first. Gone too. I swear, by 2015 Boris is going to have like 5 reviews.
|
|
| Author: | Leechmaster [ Thu May 27, 2010 3:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=52853 wEEman33's review for The Chasm's The Spell of Retribution is pretty bare-boned, consisting of just a few brief comparisons with previous material and practically no musical description. Hell, if I wasn't familiar with the band I wouldn't even know what genre it is. |
|
| Author: | Visionary [ Thu May 27, 2010 11:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Leechmaster wrote: http://metal-archives.com/review.php?id=52853
wEEman33's review for The Chasm's The Spell of Retribution is pretty bare-boned, consisting of just a few brief comparisons with previous material and practically no musical description. Hell, if I wasn't familiar with the band I wouldn't even know what genre it is. I haven't listened to the band and didn't get a single thing out of that review. It could be pop and sound like Britney spears for all I know.
|
|
| Author: | Radagast [ Fri May 28, 2010 7:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
http://www.metal-archives.com/review.php?id=1518#37126 angel_of_pain_000's review is poorly formatted, very thin on description and suffers from a few translation issues. |
|
| Page 153 of 239 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|